RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

circlestarzero/EX-chatGPT

Default branch main · commit ddfe9c4f · scanned 5/15/2026, 4:08:01 AM

GitHub: 1,968 stars · 320 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
28 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface circlestarzero/EX-chatGPT, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README's opening paragraph to clarify its role as a ChatGPT enhancement

    Why:

    CURRENT
    ChatGPT 是一个强大的工具平台，可以无需任何调整就生成 API 请求来协助回答问题。`Ex-ChatGPT` 使得 ChatGPT 能够调用外部 API，例如 **WolframAlpha、Google 和 WikiMedia**，以提供更准确和及时的答案。
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Ex-ChatGPT is an advanced enhancement for ChatGPT, enabling it to truly go online and call external APIs like WolframAlpha, Google, and WikiMedia for more accurate and timely answers. This project offers both a powerful service and a browser extension to supercharge your ChatGPT experience.
  • mediumhomepage#2
    Create a dedicated homepage for the project

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a simple landing page (e.g., a GitHub Pages site or a dedicated domain) that introduces both the `Ex-ChatGPT` service and the `WebChatGPTEnhance` browser extension, providing clear links to installation and usage for each.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface circlestarzero/EX-chatGPT
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
LangChain
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. LangChain · recommended 2×
  2. LlamaIndex · recommended 2×
  3. Microsoft Semantic Kernel · recommended 2×
  4. OpenAI Functions · recommended 1×
  5. Haystack · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I extend a large language model's capabilities with external API calls for up-to-date information?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain
    2. LlamaIndex
    3. OpenAI Functions
    4. Microsoft Semantic Kernel
    5. Haystack

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named circlestarzero/EX-chatGPT. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What tools allow adding web search and external API access to a chatbot interface?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain
    2. LlamaIndex
    3. OpenAI Assistants API
    4. Microsoft Semantic Kernel
    5. Botpress
    6. Voiceflow
    7. requests
    8. axios
    9. google-search-results
    10. serperdev
    11. OpenAI client library

    AI recommended 11 alternatives but never named circlestarzero/EX-chatGPT. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of circlestarzero/EX-chatGPT?
    pass
    AI did not name circlestarzero/EX-chatGPT — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts circlestarzero/EX-chatGPT in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named circlestarzero/EX-chatGPT explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo circlestarzero/EX-chatGPT solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named circlestarzero/EX-chatGPT explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of circlestarzero/EX-chatGPT. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/circlestarzero/EX-chatGPT.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/circlestarzero/EX-chatGPT)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/circlestarzero/EX-chatGPT"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/circlestarzero/EX-chatGPT.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

circlestarzero/EX-chatGPT — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite