RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

cisco-ai-defense/skill-scanner

Default branch main · commit ff708ea0 · scanned 5/10/2026, 5:11:21 AM

GitHub: 1,951 stars · 239 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
33 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface cisco-ai-defense/skill-scanner, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README H1 and opening paragraph to clarify 'AI Agent Skills'

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # Skill Scanner
    ...
    A best-effort security scanner for AI Agent Skills that detects prompt injection, data exfiltration, and malicious code patterns.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # Skill Scanner: Security for AI Agent Skills
    A best-effort security scanner specifically designed for **AI Agent Skills** (e.g., OpenAI Codex Skills, Cursor Agent Skills). It detects prompt injection, data exfiltration, and malicious code patterns, differentiating itself from general code analysis tools by focusing on the unique security challenges of AI agents.
  • mediumreadme#2
    Add explicit license clarification to README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a section or line in the README, e.g., 'This project is licensed under [Specific License Name(s) from the LICENSE file]. See the [LICENSE file](LICENSE) for details.' (Replace bracketed text with the actual license name(s) from your LICENSE file).
  • mediumtopics#3
    Expand GitHub topics with specific AI security terms

    Why:

    CURRENT
    agent, agent-skills, security
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    agent, agent-skills, security, prompt-injection, data-exfiltration, ai-security, llm-security

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface cisco-ai-defense/skill-scanner
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
guardrails-ai/guardrails
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. guardrails-ai/guardrails · recommended 1×
  2. Microsoft Azure AI Content Safety · recommended 1×
  3. Google Cloud DLP · recommended 1×
  4. OpenAI Moderation API · recommended 1×
  5. langchain-ai/langchain · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I secure my AI agent skills from prompt injection and data exfiltration attacks?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Guardrails AI (guardrails-ai/guardrails)
    2. Microsoft Azure AI Content Safety
    3. Google Cloud DLP
    4. OpenAI Moderation API
    5. LangChain (langchain-ai/langchain)
    6. OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications
    7. Semantic Kernel (microsoft/semantic-kernel)
    8. Intel SGX
    9. AMD SEV

    AI recommended 9 alternatives but never named cisco-ai-defense/skill-scanner. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What tools detect malicious code patterns and data exfiltration in AI agent applications?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Snyk Code
    2. Checkmarx SAST (CxSAST)
    3. OWASP ZAP (Zed Attack Proxy)
    4. PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition
    5. Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
    6. Splunk Enterprise Security
    7. Elastic Security
    8. Deepfence ThreatMapper
    9. Deepfence ThreatStryker

    AI recommended 9 alternatives but never named cisco-ai-defense/skill-scanner. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of cisco-ai-defense/skill-scanner?
    pass
    AI did not name cisco-ai-defense/skill-scanner — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts cisco-ai-defense/skill-scanner in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named cisco-ai-defense/skill-scanner explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo cisco-ai-defense/skill-scanner solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named cisco-ai-defense/skill-scanner explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of cisco-ai-defense/skill-scanner. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/cisco-ai-defense/skill-scanner.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/cisco-ai-defense/skill-scanner)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/cisco-ai-defense/skill-scanner"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/cisco-ai-defense/skill-scanner.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

cisco-ai-defense/skill-scanner — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite