RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

ckreiling/mcp-server-docker

Default branch main · commit 6288015c · scanned 5/30/2026, 1:18:07 PM

GitHub: 717 stars · 97 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
28 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface ckreiling/mcp-server-docker, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README H1 and opening to clarify 'MCP' and its purpose

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # 🐋 Docker MCP server

An MCP server for managing Docker with natural language!
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # 🐋 Docker Natural Language Server (MCP)

An **M**ulti-**C**ontainer **P**latform (MCP) server for managing Docker with natural language!
  • hightopics#2
    Add relevant topics to improve categorization signals

    Why:

    CURRENT
    (none)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    docker, natural-language-processing, llm, ai-assistant, container-management, orchestration, generative-ai
  • mediumhomepage#3
    Add a homepage URL to the repository metadata

    Why:

    CURRENT
    (none)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://ckreiling.github.io/mcp-server-docker/

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface ckreiling/mcp-server-docker
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Portainer Business Edition
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Portainer Business Edition · recommended 1×
  2. ChatGPT · recommended 1×
  3. Google Gemini · recommended 1×
  4. Claude · recommended 1×
  5. Docker Desktop · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I manage Docker containers and services using natural language commands?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Portainer Business Edition
    2. ChatGPT
    3. Google Gemini
    4. Claude
    5. Docker Desktop
    6. LazyDocker
    7. KubeSail
    8. Rancher Desktop

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named ckreiling/mcp-server-docker. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What tools allow AI assistants to orchestrate and debug Docker applications?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Kubernetes
    2. Kube-ops-view
    3. Lens
    4. Docker Compose
    5. Portainer
    6. Rancher
    7. Watchtower
    8. Prometheus
    9. Grafana
    10. ELK Stack
    11. Elasticsearch
    12. Logstash
    13. Kibana

    AI recommended 13 alternatives but never named ckreiling/mcp-server-docker. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of ckreiling/mcp-server-docker?
    pass
    AI named ckreiling/mcp-server-docker explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts ckreiling/mcp-server-docker in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named ckreiling/mcp-server-docker explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo ckreiling/mcp-server-docker solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name ckreiling/mcp-server-docker — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of ckreiling/mcp-server-docker. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/ckreiling/mcp-server-docker.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/ckreiling/mcp-server-docker)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/ckreiling/mcp-server-docker"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/ckreiling/mcp-server-docker.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

ckreiling/mcp-server-docker — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite