RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

classmethod/tsumiki

Default branch main · commit 9a0a2348 · scanned 6/2/2026, 9:27:52 PM

GitHub: 967 stars · 63 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface classmethod/tsumiki, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highabout#1
    Update the repository description to be more specific

    Why:

    CURRENT
    tsumiki
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    AI-driven development framework for automating software development processes from requirements to implementation, primarily supporting Claude Code Plugin.
  • mediumreadme#2
    Add a concise English summary at the top of the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Tsumiki is an AI-driven development framework designed to automate and streamline the entire software development lifecycle, from requirements definition to implementation. It primarily integrates with the Claude Code Plugin to provide comprehensive tools for TDD, code generation, and project analysis.

# Tsumiki - AI駆動開発支援フレームワーク

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface classmethod/tsumiki
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
GitHub Copilot
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. GitHub Copilot · recommended 2×
  2. Tabnine · recommended 2×
  3. CodiumAI · recommended 2×
  4. GitHub Copilot Chat · recommended 1×
  5. ChatGPT Enterprise · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I leverage AI to automate my software development process from requirements to implementation?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. GitHub Copilot Chat
    2. ChatGPT Enterprise
    3. Google Gemini
    4. GitHub Copilot
    5. Amazon CodeWhisperer
    6. Tabnine
    7. CodiumAI
    8. Applitools Eyes
    9. Testim.io
    10. Dynatrace

    AI recommended 10 alternatives but never named classmethod/tsumiki. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What tools assist developers with AI-driven test-driven development and code documentation generation?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. GitHub Copilot
    2. Tabnine
    3. CodiumAI
    4. OpenAI API
    5. Documatic
    6. Swimm

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named classmethod/tsumiki. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of classmethod/tsumiki?
    pass
    AI named classmethod/tsumiki explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts classmethod/tsumiki in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named classmethod/tsumiki explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo classmethod/tsumiki solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named classmethod/tsumiki explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of classmethod/tsumiki. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/classmethod/tsumiki.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/classmethod/tsumiki)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/classmethod/tsumiki"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/classmethod/tsumiki.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

classmethod/tsumiki — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite