RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

coder/mux

Default branch main · commit bc975ce7 · scanned 6/29/2026, 5:07:02 AM

GitHub: 1,879 stars · 119 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
40 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface coder/mux, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Add a clear disambiguation note to the README's opening

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Mux is a desktop & browser application for parallel agentic development. It enables developers to plan and execute tasks with multiple AI agents on local or remote compute.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Mux is a desktop & browser application for parallel agentic development. **(Note: This project is distinct from the network multiplexing component sometimes associated with the Coder platform.)** It enables developers to plan and execute tasks with multiple AI agents on local or remote compute.
  • mediumtopics#2
    Expand and refine repository topics for better categorization

    Why:

    CURRENT
    agent, ide
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ai-agent, agentic-development, ai-coding, development-environment, ide, llm-agents, parallel-development, workspace
  • mediumreadme#3
    Add a 'Why Mux?' or 'Comparison' section to the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ### Why Mux?
Mux uniquely combines a dedicated desktop environment with advanced tooling for managing multiple AI agents. Unlike general-purpose remote development solutions, Mux is purpose-built for the iterative, isolated, and parallel nature of agentic software development. While pure agent frameworks provide libraries, Mux offers a complete, integrated workspace for planning, executing, and reviewing agent-driven code.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface coder/mux
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
langchain-ai/langchain
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. langchain-ai/langchain · recommended 1×
  2. Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT · recommended 1×
  3. yoheinakajima/babyagi · recommended 1×
  4. GitHub Actions · recommended 1×
  5. GitLab CI/CD · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I manage multiple AI agents for parallel software development tasks effectively?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain (langchain-ai/langchain)
    2. AutoGPT (Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT)
    3. BabyAGI (yoheinakajima/babyagi)
    4. GitHub Actions
    5. GitLab CI/CD
    6. Jira
    7. Asana
    8. Docker
    9. Kubernetes (kubernetes/kubernetes)
    10. VS Code (microsoft/vscode)
    11. GitHub Copilot

    AI recommended 11 alternatives but never named coder/mux. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What tools provide an integrated desktop environment for isolated AI-driven coding workspaces?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. VS Code Remote Development
    2. JetBrains Gateway
    3. Codeanywhere
    4. Gitpod (gitpod-io/gitpod)
    5. Codiad (Codiad/Codiad)
    6. AWS Cloud9

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named coder/mux. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of coder/mux?
    pass
    AI named coder/mux explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts coder/mux in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named coder/mux explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo coder/mux solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named coder/mux explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of coder/mux. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/coder/mux.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/coder/mux)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/coder/mux"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/coder/mux.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

coder/mux — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite