RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

cognizant-ai-lab/neuro-san-studio

Default branch main · commit 45a44c1e · scanned 6/4/2026, 9:41:10 PM

GitHub: 521 stars · 178 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
27 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
1 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface cognizant-ai-lab/neuro-san-studio, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highabout#1
    Update repository description for clarity

    Why:

    CURRENT
    A playground for neuro-san
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    A hands-on studio for designing, testing, and deploying sophisticated multi-agent AI systems using the Neuro SAN framework.
  • mediumreadme#2
    Add a 'Comparison' section to the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a new section, e.g., '## Neuro SAN Studio vs. Other Frameworks' or '## Why Choose Neuro SAN Studio?' that explicitly outlines its differentiators against common alternatives in the multi-agent AI space.
  • lowreadme#3
    Add a dedicated 'Key Features' section to the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a new section, e.g., '## Key Features' or '## What You Can Do' with a bulleted list of core functionalities (e.g., 'Design agent networks visually', 'Test agent behaviors', 'Deploy production solutions', 'No-code configuration for domain experts').

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface cognizant-ai-lab/neuro-san-studio
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
LangChain
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. LangChain · recommended 2×
  2. LlamaIndex · recommended 2×
  3. Haystack · recommended 2×
  4. AutoGen · recommended 2×
  5. CrewAI · recommended 2×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What frameworks simplify building and orchestrating intelligent multi-agent AI systems effectively?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain
    2. LlamaIndex
    3. Haystack
    4. AutoGen
    5. CrewAI
    6. SPADE
    7. Mesa

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named cognizant-ai-lab/neuro-san-studio. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Seeking a studio for quickly prototyping and deploying sophisticated LLM-powered multi-agent networks.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain
    2. AutoGen
    3. CrewAI
    4. LlamaIndex
    5. Haystack
    6. OpenAI Assistants API
    7. Marvin

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named cognizant-ai-lab/neuro-san-studio. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of cognizant-ai-lab/neuro-san-studio?
    pass
    AI did not name cognizant-ai-lab/neuro-san-studio — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts cognizant-ai-lab/neuro-san-studio in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named cognizant-ai-lab/neuro-san-studio explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo cognizant-ai-lab/neuro-san-studio solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name cognizant-ai-lab/neuro-san-studio — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of cognizant-ai-lab/neuro-san-studio. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/cognizant-ai-lab/neuro-san-studio.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/cognizant-ai-lab/neuro-san-studio)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/cognizant-ai-lab/neuro-san-studio"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/cognizant-ai-lab/neuro-san-studio.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

cognizant-ai-lab/neuro-san-studio — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite