RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

companion-inc/feynman

Default branch main · commit cb5fa567 · scanned 6/29/2026, 11:31:40 PM

GitHub: 8,163 stars · 970 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface companion-inc/feynman, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highabout#1
    Add a concise About description

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Feynman is a self-hosted, local-first, privacy-focused AI assistant delivered as a polished desktop application for automating AI research tasks.
  • highreadme#2
    Clarify the project's nature as a desktop application in the README intro

    Why:

    CURRENT
    <p align="center">The open source AI research agent.</p>
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    <p align="center">Feynman is a self-hosted, local-first AI research agent delivered as a standalone desktop application.</p>

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface companion-inc/feynman
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
LangChain
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. LangChain · recommended 1×
  2. LlamaIndex · recommended 1×
  3. AutoGPT · recommended 1×
  4. Haystack · recommended 1×
  5. Open Interpreter · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I automate AI research tasks using an open-source agent?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain
    2. LlamaIndex
    3. AutoGPT
    4. Haystack
    5. Open Interpreter
    6. AgentVerse
    7. CrewAI

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named companion-inc/feynman. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are self-contained AI agents for automating scientific discovery workflows?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. AutoGPT (Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT)
    2. AgentGPT
    3. SuperAGI (TransformerOptimus/SuperAGI)
    4. ChemCrow (chemcrow/chemcrow)
    5. BioGPT (microsoft/BioGPT)
    6. OpenAI's Function Calling
    7. GPT-4
    8. LangChain (langchain-ai/langchain)
    9. DeepMind's AlphaFold (deepmind/alphafold)
    10. Hugging Face Agents

    AI recommended 10 alternatives but never named companion-inc/feynman. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of companion-inc/feynman?
    pass
    AI named companion-inc/feynman explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts companion-inc/feynman in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named companion-inc/feynman explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo companion-inc/feynman solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named companion-inc/feynman explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of companion-inc/feynman. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/companion-inc/feynman.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/companion-inc/feynman)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/companion-inc/feynman"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/companion-inc/feynman.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

companion-inc/feynman — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite