RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

conorwilliams/libfork

Default branch main · commit 2f359cda · scanned 5/22/2026, 3:25:13 PM

GitHub: 870 stars · 44 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
40 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface conorwilliams/libfork, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README H1 and clarify 'fork' meaning

    Why:

    CURRENT
    <h1 align="center"> Welcome to <tt>libfork</tt> 🍴 </h1>
    
    <p align="center">
    ... (badges) ...
    </p>
    
    <p align="center">
      A bleeding edge, lock-free, wait-free, continuation-stealing coroutine-tasking library.
    </p>
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    <h1 align="center"> libfork 🍴: A C++20 Coroutine Library for Lock-Free, Wait-Free Fork-Join Task Parallelism </h1>
    
    <p align="center">
    ... (badges) ...
    </p>
    
    <p align="center">
      A bleeding edge, lock-free, wait-free, continuation-stealing coroutine-tasking library.
      <br>
      <strong>Note: 'fork' in libfork refers to fork-join parallelism for tasks, not the <code>posix_fork</code> system call.</strong>
    </p>
  • mediumreadme#2
    Add a 'Comparison to Alternatives' section

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a new section, e.g., `## Comparison to Alternatives`, that outlines how `libfork` differs from and complements libraries like TBB, HPX, Boost.Fiber, and lower-level primitives in the context of C++20 coroutine-based tasking.
  • lowreadme#3
    Add a 'Problem Solved' or 'Why libfork?' section

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a new section, e.g., `## Why libfork?` or `## The Problem libfork Solves`, that clearly articulates the challenges in C++20 coroutine-based parallel tasking that `libfork` aims to overcome.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface conorwilliams/libfork
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
std::atomic
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. std::atomic · recommended 1×
  2. Boost.Atomic · recommended 1×
  3. Boost.Lockfree · recommended 1×
  4. Concurrency Kit (CK) · recommended 1×
  5. Intel TBB Concurrent Containers · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I achieve lock-free, wait-free concurrency with C++20 coroutines for parallel tasks?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. std::atomic
    2. Boost.Atomic
    3. Boost.Lockfree
    4. Concurrency Kit (CK)
    5. Intel TBB Concurrent Containers
    6. Seastar

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named conorwilliams/libfork. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are robust C++ libraries for ultra-fine grained parallel tasking with low overhead?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Intel Threading Building Blocks (TBB)
    2. HPX (High Performance ParalleX)
    3. OpenMP (Open Multi-Processing)
    4. Boost.Fiber
    5. C++20 Concurrency Features (JSS/P2300)
    6. Folly (Facebook Open-source Library)

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named conorwilliams/libfork. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of conorwilliams/libfork?
    pass
    AI named conorwilliams/libfork explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts conorwilliams/libfork in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named conorwilliams/libfork explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo conorwilliams/libfork solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named conorwilliams/libfork explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of conorwilliams/libfork. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/conorwilliams/libfork.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/conorwilliams/libfork)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/conorwilliams/libfork"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/conorwilliams/libfork.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

conorwilliams/libfork — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite