RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

curieuxjy/Awesome_Quadrupedal_Robots

Default branch main · commit e1783406 · scanned 5/13/2026, 4:28:06 AM

GitHub: 1,086 stars · 96 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
22 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
1 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface curieuxjy/Awesome_Quadrupedal_Robots, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Clarify README's opening to state it's an "Awesome List" of resources

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # Awesome_Quadrupedal_Robots [](https://github.com/sindresorhus/awesome)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # Awesome Quadrupedal Robots: A Curated List of Resources
  • highlicense#2
    Add a LICENSE file to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a LICENSE file (e.g., MIT License) in the repository root.
  • mediumhomepage#3
    Add the repository URL as the homepage

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Set the homepage URL in the repository's About section to: https://github.com/curieuxjy/Awesome_Quadrupedal_Robots

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface curieuxjy/Awesome_Quadrupedal_Robots
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Spot
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Spot · recommended 2×
  2. ANYmal · recommended 2×
  3. Open Dynamic Robot Initiative · recommended 2×
  4. mit-biomimetics/Mini-Cheetah-Software · recommended 1×
  5. Unitree Robotics · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Where can I find comprehensive resources to learn about designing and building quadrupedal robots?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Mini Cheetah (mit-biomimetics/Mini-Cheetah-Software)
    2. Spot
    3. ANYmal
    4. Unitree Robotics
    5. Open Dynamic Robot Initiative
    6. Robot Dynamics and Control
    7. Modern Robotics: Mechanics, Planning, and Control
    8. University of Pennsylvania's Robotics Specialization
    9. ETH Zurich's Robot Dynamics and Control

    AI recommended 9 alternatives but never named curieuxjy/Awesome_Quadrupedal_Robots. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are the latest research papers and platforms for developing advanced quadrupedal locomotion systems?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. ROS
    2. ROS 2
    3. Gazebo
    4. PyBullet
    5. NVIDIA Isaac Gym
    6. ANYmal
    7. Unitree Go1
    8. Unitree A1
    9. Spot
    10. Open Dynamic Robot Initiative

    AI recommended 10 alternatives but never named curieuxjy/Awesome_Quadrupedal_Robots. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of curieuxjy/Awesome_Quadrupedal_Robots?
    pass
    AI did not name curieuxjy/Awesome_Quadrupedal_Robots — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts curieuxjy/Awesome_Quadrupedal_Robots in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named curieuxjy/Awesome_Quadrupedal_Robots explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo curieuxjy/Awesome_Quadrupedal_Robots solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name curieuxjy/Awesome_Quadrupedal_Robots — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of curieuxjy/Awesome_Quadrupedal_Robots. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/curieuxjy/Awesome_Quadrupedal_Robots.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/curieuxjy/Awesome_Quadrupedal_Robots)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/curieuxjy/Awesome_Quadrupedal_Robots"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/curieuxjy/Awesome_Quadrupedal_Robots.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

curieuxjy/Awesome_Quadrupedal_Robots — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite