RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

cyanheads/obsidian-mcp-server

Default branch main · commit 230cd813 · scanned 6/6/2026, 3:17:05 AM

GitHub: 577 stars · 88 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
33 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface cyanheads/obsidian-mcp-server, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Add a clear disambiguation to the README's opening paragraph

    Why:

    CURRENT
    MCP server for Obsidian vaults — read, write, search, and surgically edit notes, tags, and frontmatter via the Local REST API plugin. STDIO or Streamable HTTP.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    **obsidian-mcp-server** is an **MCP (Model Context Protocol) server for Obsidian vaults** — *not* a Minecraft server. It enables programmatic read, write, search, and surgical editing of notes, tags, and frontmatter via the Local REST API plugin, supporting STDIO or Streamable HTTP.
  • mediumreadme#2
    Add a dedicated section or expand on AI integration capabilities in the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ## AI Integration & Contextual Understanding

Leverage `obsidian-mcp-server` to seamlessly integrate AI models with your Obsidian knowledge base. Its programmatic access to notes, tags, and frontmatter allows AI agents to read, understand, and modify your personal knowledge graph, enabling advanced contextual understanding, automated content generation, and intelligent search capabilities.
  • mediumtopics#3
    Expand repository topics to include more specific keywords for programmatic access and knowledge management

    Why:

    CURRENT
    ai-tools, cyanheads, knowledge-base, mcp, model-context-protocol, note-taking, obsidian, typescript
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ai-tools, cyanheads, knowledge-base, mcp, model-context-protocol, note-taking, obsidian, typescript, rest-api, programmatic-access, knowledge-graph, ai-agents, personal-knowledge-management

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface cyanheads/obsidian-mcp-server
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Obsidian
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Obsidian · recommended 2×
  2. Logseq · recommended 2×
  3. Joplin · recommended 1×
  4. Notion · recommended 1×
  5. TiddlyWiki · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to programmatically access and edit notes in a local knowledge base via REST API?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Obsidian
    2. Joplin
    3. Logseq
    4. Notion
    5. TiddlyWiki
    6. Dendron

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named cyanheads/obsidian-mcp-server. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Tools for integrating AI models with a personal knowledge base for contextual understanding?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Obsidian
    2. Dataview
    3. Text Generator
    4. Smart Connections
    5. LLM Explorer
    6. Mem.ai
    7. Logseq
    8. Logseq AI
    9. Logseq OpenAI GPT-3
    10. Notion AI
    11. Anytype
    12. LlamaIndex
    13. LangChain

    AI recommended 13 alternatives but never named cyanheads/obsidian-mcp-server. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of cyanheads/obsidian-mcp-server?
    pass
    AI did not name cyanheads/obsidian-mcp-server — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts cyanheads/obsidian-mcp-server in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named cyanheads/obsidian-mcp-server explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo cyanheads/obsidian-mcp-server solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named cyanheads/obsidian-mcp-server explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of cyanheads/obsidian-mcp-server. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/cyanheads/obsidian-mcp-server.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/cyanheads/obsidian-mcp-server)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/cyanheads/obsidian-mcp-server"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/cyanheads/obsidian-mcp-server.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

cyanheads/obsidian-mcp-server — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite