RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

cypress-io/cypress-documentation

Default branch main · commit 7ed1c266 · scanned 6/29/2026, 6:18:33 PM

GitHub: 1,042 stars · 1,061 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
33 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface cypress-io/cypress-documentation, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README opening to clearly state its purpose

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # Cypress Documentation
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # Cypress Documentation
    
    This repository provides the official documentation for the Cypress end-to-end testing framework, covering its app, API, Cypress Cloud, UI coverage, and accessibility features. It serves as the primary resource for developers and QA engineers using Cypress.
  • mediumabout#2
    Refine the GitHub repository description

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Cypress Documentation for the Cypress App, API, Cypress Cloud, UI Coverage and Cypress Accessibility.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Official documentation for the Cypress end-to-end testing framework, covering its app, API, Cypress Cloud, UI coverage, and accessibility features.
  • lowreadme#3
    Add an explicit 'Who is this for?' section to the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ## Who is this for?
    This documentation is designed for developers, QA engineers, and anyone implementing or maintaining automated tests with the Cypress end-to-end testing framework.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface cypress-io/cypress-documentation
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
storybookjs/storybook
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. storybookjs/storybook · recommended 2×
  2. Playwright · recommended 1×
  3. Cypress · recommended 1×
  4. Selenium WebDriver · recommended 1×
  5. TestNG · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are reliable frameworks for automated end-to-end testing of web applications?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Playwright
    2. Cypress
    3. Selenium WebDriver
    4. TestNG
    5. JUnit
    6. Puppeteer
    7. WebdriverIO

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named cypress-io/cypress-documentation. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I implement comprehensive UI and API testing for my frontend projects?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Cypress (cypress-io/cypress)
    2. Playwright (microsoft/playwright)
    3. Postman
    4. Jest (jestjs/jest)
    5. Supertest (visionmedia/supertest)
    6. Mock Service Worker (MSW) (mswjs/msw)
    7. Storybook (storybookjs/storybook)
    8. Storybook Interaction Addon (storybookjs/storybook)
    9. Newman (postmanlabs/newman)

    AI recommended 9 alternatives but never named cypress-io/cypress-documentation. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of cypress-io/cypress-documentation?
    pass
    AI named cypress-io/cypress-documentation explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts cypress-io/cypress-documentation in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named cypress-io/cypress-documentation explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo cypress-io/cypress-documentation solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name cypress-io/cypress-documentation — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of cypress-io/cypress-documentation. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/cypress-io/cypress-documentation.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/cypress-io/cypress-documentation)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/cypress-io/cypress-documentation"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/cypress-io/cypress-documentation.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

cypress-io/cypress-documentation — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite