RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

daodao97/code-switch

Default branch main · commit d4868658 · scanned 6/9/2026, 2:26:44 AM

GitHub: 822 stars · 116 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface daodao97/code-switch, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README H1 to clarify its function as an AI proxy/management tool

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # Code Switch
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # Code Switch: Multi-Vendor Proxy & Management for Claude Code & Codex
  • mediumhomepage#2
    Add the repository URL as the project homepage

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://github.com/daodao97/code-switch

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface daodao97/code-switch
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
LangChain
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. LangChain · recommended 1×
  2. LlamaIndex · recommended 1×
  3. OpenAI API · recommended 1×
  4. Azure AI Studio · recommended 1×
  5. Google Cloud Vertex AI · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to centralize management for multiple AI code generation service providers?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain
    2. LlamaIndex
    3. OpenAI API
    4. Azure AI Studio
    5. Google Cloud Vertex AI
    6. Portkey.ai
    7. LiteLLM
    8. NGINX
    9. Kong

    AI recommended 9 alternatives but never named daodao97/code-switch. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Seeking a local proxy for AI coding assistants with usage tracking and skill management.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Continue.dev (continue-dev/continue)
    2. Open WebUI (open-webui/open-webui)
    3. LocalAI (mudler/LocalAI)
    4. Ollama (ollama/ollama)
    5. Nginx
    6. Caddy (caddyserver/caddy)
    7. Flask (pallets/flask)
    8. FastAPI (tiangolo/fastapi)
    9. LiteLLM Proxy (BerriAI/litellm)
    10. Portkey.ai (Portkey-AI/gateway)

    AI recommended 10 alternatives but never named daodao97/code-switch. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of daodao97/code-switch?
    pass
    AI named daodao97/code-switch explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts daodao97/code-switch in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named daodao97/code-switch explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo daodao97/code-switch solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named daodao97/code-switch explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of daodao97/code-switch. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/daodao97/code-switch.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/daodao97/code-switch)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/daodao97/code-switch"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/daodao97/code-switch.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

daodao97/code-switch — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite