RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

darcyegb/ClaudeCodeAgents

Default branch master · commit 84490fcd · scanned 6/4/2026, 1:48:04 AM

GitHub: 713 stars · 65 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
23 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 0 warn · 1 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface darcyegb/ClaudeCodeAgents, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • hightopics#1
    Add specific topics to improve categorization

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    claude, anthropic, ai-agents, code-quality, code-review, verification, qa, llm-agents, agent-definitions
  • highreadme#2
    Reposition README opening to clarify specific niche

    Why:

    CURRENT
    This repository contains a collection of specialized agent definitions for Claude Code, Anthropic's AI-powered coding assistant. These agents extend Claude Code's capabilities with specialized behaviors for common development tasks.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    This repository offers a curated collection of specialized agent definitions designed exclusively for Claude Code, Anthropic's AI-powered coding assistant. Unlike generic AI coding tools, these agents provide focused, pre-configured behaviors to extend Claude Code's capabilities for specific development tasks like code verification, compliance checking, and quality assessment.
  • mediumlicense#3
    Add license information to the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ## License

This project is currently unlicensed. Please choose a license (e.g., MIT, Apache-2.0) and add a LICENSE file to the repository root, then update this section to reflect it.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface darcyegb/ClaudeCodeAgents
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Snyk Code
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Snyk Code · recommended 2×
  2. GitHub Copilot · recommended 1×
  3. GitLab Duo Code Suggestions · recommended 1×
  4. OpenAI API · recommended 1×
  5. GPT-4 · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to use AI to verify implemented code against project specifications?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. GitHub Copilot
    2. GitLab Duo Code Suggestions
    3. OpenAI API
    4. GPT-4
    5. Sourcegraph
    6. OpenGrok
    7. DeepCode AI by Snyk
    8. Snyk Code
    9. Amazon CodeGuru Reviewer
    10. Anthropic Claude
    11. Llama 2
    12. Frama-C
    13. Dafny

    AI recommended 13 alternatives but never named darcyegb/ClaudeCodeAgents. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for an AI assistant to check code changes for project guideline compliance.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. GitHub Copilot Enterprise
    2. Codeium Enterprise
    3. Tabnine Enterprise
    4. Snyk Code
    5. Codiga
    6. SonarQube (SonarSource/sonarqube)

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named darcyegb/ClaudeCodeAgents. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    fail

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of darcyegb/ClaudeCodeAgents?
    pass
    AI named darcyegb/ClaudeCodeAgents explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts darcyegb/ClaudeCodeAgents in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named darcyegb/ClaudeCodeAgents explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo darcyegb/ClaudeCodeAgents solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name darcyegb/ClaudeCodeAgents — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of darcyegb/ClaudeCodeAgents. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/darcyegb/ClaudeCodeAgents.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/darcyegb/ClaudeCodeAgents)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/darcyegb/ClaudeCodeAgents"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/darcyegb/ClaudeCodeAgents.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

darcyegb/ClaudeCodeAgents — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite