REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

decolua/9router

Default branch master · commit db4499d6 · scanned 6/20/2026, 12:07:03 AM

GitHub: 18,016 stars · 2,821 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE

33 /100

Critical

Category recall

0 / 2

Not recommended in any query

Rule findings

2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail

Objective metadata checks

AI knows your name

2 / 3

Direct prompts that named your repo

HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface decolua/9router, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION

highreadme#1

Add a clear statement in the README's opening to counter 'Lua HTTP router' miscategorization

Why:

COPY-PASTE FIX

Insert this sentence immediately after the H1: "While developed by decolua, this project is a universal AI router and token saver for AI coding tools and LLMs, not a generic Lua web framework."

mediumreadme#2

Strengthen the README's opening to explicitly mention 'AI coding assistants' and 'multiple AI models'

Why:

CURRENT

Connect All AI Code Tools (Claude Code, Cursor, Antigravity, Copilot, Codex, Gemini, OpenCode, Cline, OpenClaw...) to 40+ AI Providers & 100+ Models.

COPY-PASTE FIX

Connect all your AI coding assistants (Claude Code, Cursor, Antigravity, Copilot, Codex, Gemini, OpenCode, Cline, OpenClaw...) and other LLM tools to 40+ AI Providers & 100+ Models.

lowcomparison#3

Add a 'Comparison' section to differentiate from local LLM runtimes

Why:

COPY-PASTE FIX

Add a new section, e.g., "## 🆚 9Router vs. Alternatives" that clarifies how 9Router differs from local LLM runtimes (like Ollama, LM Studio) and other AI proxies/gateways, emphasizing its focus on token saving, auto-fallback, and connecting existing AI coding tools to cloud providers.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall

0 / 2

0% of queries surface decolua/9router

Avg rank

—

Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.

Share of voice

Of all named tools, what % are you?

Top rival

ollama/ollama

Recommended in 1 of 2 queries

COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD

ollama/ollama · recommended 1×
LM Studio · recommended 1×
ggerganov/llama.cpp · recommended 1×
Llama 3 8B · recommended 1×
Mistral 7B · recommended 1×

CATEGORY QUERY
How to reduce token usage and save money when using multiple AI coding assistants?
you: not recommended
AI recommended (in order):
1. Ollama (ollama/ollama)
2. LM Studio
3. Llama.cpp (ggerganov/llama.cpp)
4. Llama 3 8B
5. Mistral 7B
6. CodeLlama 7B/13B
7. Continue.dev (continue-dev/continue)
8. CodeGPT (carlrobertoh/CodeGPT)
9. LiteLLM (BerriAI/litellm)
10. OpenRouter.ai
11. GPT-3.5 Turbo
12. Claude 3 Haiku
13. Gemini 1.5 Flash
14. Mistral Small/Tiny
AI recommended 14 alternatives but never named decolua/9router. This is the gap to close.
Show full AI answer
CATEGORY QUERY
What tools help manage multiple AI coding models with automatic fallback and bypass rate limits?
you: not recommended
AI recommended (in order):
1. OpenAI API
2. Node.js
3. Express.js
4. Python
5. FastAPI
6. Flask
7. LiteLLM
8. LangChain
9. LlamaIndex
10. Azure AI Studio
11. Azure OpenAI Service
12. Traffic Manager
13. API Management
14. Deployment Slots
15. AWS API Gateway
16. AWS Lambda
17. Nginx
18. OpenResty
AI recommended 18 alternatives but never named decolua/9router. This is the gap to close.
Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

Metadata completeness
pass
README presence
pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of decolua/9router?
pass
AI named decolua/9router explicitly
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?
If a team adopts decolua/9router in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
pass
AI named decolua/9router explicitly
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?
In one sentence, what problem does the repo decolua/9router solve, and who is the primary audience?
pass
AI did not name decolua/9router — likely talking about a different project
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of decolua/9router. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

Live preview

MARKDOWN (README)

[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/decolua/9router.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/decolua/9router)

HTML

<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/decolua/9router"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/decolua/9router.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>

Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

decolua/9router — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

Deep reports10 / month
Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite