RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

devflowinc/trieve

Default branch main · commit a99b21e2 · scanned 7/1/2026, 6:06:45 PM

GitHub: 2,684 stars · 249 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
40 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface devflowinc/trieve, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Add a direct, explicit positioning statement at the top of the README

    Why:

    CURRENT
    The README currently starts with a centered paragraph of links and then an H2.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Trieve is an all-in-one API-driven platform for integrating semantic search, recommendations, and Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) into your applications.
  • mediumcomparison#2
    Add a 'Comparison to Alternatives' section in the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ## Comparison to Alternatives

[Explain how Trieve differentiates from Pinecone, OpenAI API, Elasticsearch, and other common search/RAG platforms, focusing on its all-in-one API approach for semantic search, recommendations, and RAG.]
  • lowtopics#3
    Add more specific use-case oriented topics

    Why:

    CURRENT
    actix, actix-web, ai, artificial-intelligence, diesel, embedding, hacktoberfest, llm, postgresql, qdrant, qdrant-vector-database, rag, retrieval-augmented-generation, rust, search, search-engine, solidjs, tailwindcss, vector-search
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    actix, actix-web, ai, artificial-intelligence, diesel, embedding, hacktoberfest, llm, postgresql, qdrant, qdrant-vector-database, rag, retrieval-augmented-generation, rust, search, search-engine, solidjs, tailwindcss, vector-search, semantic-search-api, ai-search, recommendation-engine, knowledge-retrieval

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface devflowinc/trieve
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Pinecone
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Pinecone · recommended 2×
  2. OpenAI API · recommended 1×
  3. Cohere API · recommended 1×
  4. Google Cloud Vertex AI · recommended 1×
  5. Anthropic API · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I integrate retrieval-augmented generation and semantic search into my application via an API?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. OpenAI API
    2. Cohere API
    3. Google Cloud Vertex AI
    4. Anthropic API
    5. Hugging Face Inference API
    6. Pinecone
    7. Weaviate
    8. Qdrant
    9. Chroma
    10. FAISS

    AI recommended 10 alternatives but never named devflowinc/trieve. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are the best API-driven platforms for building AI-powered search and recommendation systems?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Elasticsearch
    2. Algolia
    3. Pinecone
    4. AWS OpenSearch Service
    5. Google Cloud Search
    6. Azure Cognitive Search
    7. Vespa.ai

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named devflowinc/trieve. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of devflowinc/trieve?
    pass
    AI named devflowinc/trieve explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts devflowinc/trieve in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named devflowinc/trieve explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo devflowinc/trieve solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named devflowinc/trieve explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of devflowinc/trieve. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/devflowinc/trieve.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/devflowinc/trieve)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/devflowinc/trieve"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/devflowinc/trieve.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

devflowinc/trieve — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite