RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

earthtojake/text-to-cad

Default branch main · commit 8d7bf106 · scanned 5/10/2026, 11:08:27 PM

GitHub: 2,348 stars · 279 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
40 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface earthtojake/text-to-cad, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README's opening to highlight "AI agent harness" and "code-based CAD"

    Why:

    CURRENT
    The current README starts with a title and then "An open source harness for generating 3D models with your favorite coding agent", followed by many links before "Getting Started".
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a concise, prominent paragraph immediately after the main title that clearly states its purpose as an AI agent harness for *code-based, parametric* CAD generation, differentiating it from mesh-based tools. For example: "This repository provides an open-source harness for AI agents (like Codex or Claude Code) to generate parametric, code-based CAD models from natural language descriptions. Unlike mesh-based text-to-3D tools, `text-to-cad` focuses on producing structured, editable CAD files suitable for mechanical engineering and robotics."
  • mediumtopics#2
    Add more specific topics to improve AI categorization

    Why:

    CURRENT
    3mf, agents, ai, ai-agents, build123d, cad, cad-skill, dxf, glb, mechanical-engineering, opencascade, robotics, step, stl, text-to-cad, wasm
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    3mf, agents, ai, ai-agents, build123d, cad, cad-skill, dxf, glb, mechanical-engineering, opencascade, robotics, step, stl, text-to-cad, wasm, llm, large-language-models, generative-ai, generative-cad, code-based-cad
  • lowreadme#3
    Add a 'Comparison' or 'Differentiators' section to the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a new section titled 'Why `text-to-cad`? (Differentiators)' or 'Comparison to other tools' that explicitly contrasts it with mesh-based text-to-3D generators and traditional CAD software, highlighting its focus on AI agents and code-based parametric output.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface earthtojake/text-to-cad
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
OpenSCAD
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. OpenSCAD · recommended 2×
  2. Blender · recommended 2×
  3. Shap-E · recommended 1×
  4. Meshy.ai · recommended 1×
  5. Luma AI · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I generate 3D CAD models from text descriptions using an AI assistant?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Shap-E
    2. Meshy.ai
    3. Luma AI
    4. Blockade Labs
    5. RealityCapture
    6. Metashape
    7. DreamFusion
    8. Magic3D
    9. SolidWorks
    10. Fusion 360
    11. Onshape
    12. Rhino
    13. OpenSCAD
    14. ChatGPT
    15. GitHub Copilot
    16. Midjourney
    17. DALL-E 3
    18. Blender

    AI recommended 18 alternatives but never named earthtojake/text-to-cad. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What open-source tools automate mechanical design and create CAD files with AI agents?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. OpenSCAD
    2. FreeCAD
    3. CadQuery
    4. Grasshopper
    5. Blender
    6. SolveSpace

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named earthtojake/text-to-cad. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of earthtojake/text-to-cad?
    pass
    AI named earthtojake/text-to-cad explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts earthtojake/text-to-cad in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named earthtojake/text-to-cad explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo earthtojake/text-to-cad solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named earthtojake/text-to-cad explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of earthtojake/text-to-cad. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/earthtojake/text-to-cad.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/earthtojake/text-to-cad)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/earthtojake/text-to-cad"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/earthtojake/text-to-cad.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

earthtojake/text-to-cad — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite