RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

enulus/OpenPackage

Default branch main · commit 399187d6 · scanned 5/30/2026, 11:37:34 PM

GitHub: 560 stars · 30 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
40 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface enulus/OpenPackage, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README's opening to clarify AI agent config focus

    Why:

    CURRENT
    OpenPackage enables simple, modular management of coding agent configs, providing unified installation, management, and packaging of rules, commands, agents, skills, and MCPs for any platform, any codebase.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    OpenPackage is the universal package manager specifically designed for **AI coding agent configurations**, enabling unified installation, management, and packaging of rules, commands, agents, skills, and MCPs for any platform, any codebase. Unlike general system package managers or broad AI frameworks, OpenPackage focuses solely on the modular organization and distribution of agent-specific assets.
  • mediumtopics#2
    Add more specific topics to reinforce AI agent config niche

    Why:

    CURRENT
    agents, ai, cli, coding, commands, openpackage, opkg, package-manager, plugins, rules, skills
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    agents, ai, cli, coding, commands, openpackage, opkg, package-manager, plugins, rules, skills, ai-agent-configs, agent-skills-management, llm-ops, ai-workflow-management
  • lowreadme#3
    Add a 'Comparison' section to the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ## Comparison to Other Tools
    
    **Not a General System Package Manager:** OpenPackage is not a replacement for system-level package managers like Winget, Chocolatey, or Scoop. It does not manage applications or system libraries. Instead, it specializes in the modular packaging and distribution of AI agent configurations.
    
    **Not an AI Framework:** While OpenPackage works *with* AI coding tools and frameworks like LangChain or LlamaIndex, it is not an AI framework itself. It provides the infrastructure to manage the *configs* (rules, commands, skills) that these frameworks might utilize, rather than providing AI models or orchestration logic.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface enulus/OpenPackage
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
LangChain
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. LangChain · recommended 1×
  2. LlamaIndex · recommended 1×
  3. OpenAI Functions · recommended 1×
  4. Google AI Function Calling · recommended 1×
  5. Haystack · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I effectively manage and package custom skills for my AI coding agents?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain
    2. LlamaIndex
    3. OpenAI Functions
    4. Google AI Function Calling
    5. Haystack
    6. Semantic Kernel
    7. setuptools

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named enulus/OpenPackage. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for a universal package manager to organize rules and commands for AI coding tools.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. DVC (Data Version Control)
    2. Make
    3. CMake
    4. Hydra
    5. MLflow
    6. Poetry
    7. Just (Just a command runner)
    8. Task (Task runner)

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named enulus/OpenPackage. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of enulus/OpenPackage?
    pass
    AI named enulus/OpenPackage explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts enulus/OpenPackage in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named enulus/OpenPackage explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo enulus/OpenPackage solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named enulus/OpenPackage explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of enulus/OpenPackage. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/enulus/OpenPackage.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/enulus/OpenPackage)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/enulus/OpenPackage"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/enulus/OpenPackage.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

enulus/OpenPackage — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite