RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

eon01/awesome-chatgpt

Default branch main · commit e3d7dd23 · scanned 5/27/2026, 11:43:06 PM

GitHub: 2,370 stars · 192 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
28 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface eon01/awesome-chatgpt, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README opening to emphasize "discovery hub"

    Why:

    CURRENT
    <p>A curated list of awesome ChatGPT resources, libraries, SDKs, APIs, and more.</p>
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    <p>A comprehensive, curated list of awesome ChatGPT resources, including libraries, SDKs, APIs, and more. This repository serves as a central hub for developers, researchers, and enthusiasts to discover, learn about, and navigate the vast ecosystem of ChatGPT tools and related technologies.</p>
  • mediumhomepage#2
    Add the repository URL as the homepage

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://github.com/eon01/awesome-chatgpt
  • lowlicense#3
    Clarify the existing license(s) in the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ## License
    
    This project is licensed under [INSERT ACTUAL LICENSE NAME(S) FROM LICENSE FILE, e.g., 'the MIT License and Apache-2.0 License']. Please refer to the [LICENSE file](LICENSE) for full details.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface eon01/awesome-chatgpt
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Google Dialogflow (ES/CX)
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Google Dialogflow (ES/CX) · recommended 1×
  2. Rasa Open Source · recommended 1×
  3. Microsoft Bot Framework Composer / Azure Bot Service · recommended 1×
  4. Amazon Lex · recommended 1×
  5. OpenAI API (GPT-3.5/GPT-4) · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are the best development resources and SDKs for building applications with conversational AI?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Google Dialogflow (ES/CX)
    2. Rasa Open Source
    3. Microsoft Bot Framework Composer / Azure Bot Service
    4. Amazon Lex
    5. OpenAI API (GPT-3.5/GPT-4)
    6. Hugging Face Transformers Library
    7. Wit.ai

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named eon01/awesome-chatgpt. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Where can I find a curated list of Python libraries and API wrappers for large language models?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Awesome-LLM
    2. LangChain
    3. Hugging Face Transformers
    4. LlamaIndex
    5. OpenAI Python Library
    6. Anthropic Python SDK
    7. Google Cloud Generative AI Python SDK

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named eon01/awesome-chatgpt. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of eon01/awesome-chatgpt?
    pass
    AI named eon01/awesome-chatgpt explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts eon01/awesome-chatgpt in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named eon01/awesome-chatgpt explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo eon01/awesome-chatgpt solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name eon01/awesome-chatgpt — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of eon01/awesome-chatgpt. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/eon01/awesome-chatgpt.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/eon01/awesome-chatgpt)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/eon01/awesome-chatgpt"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/eon01/awesome-chatgpt.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

eon01/awesome-chatgpt — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite