RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

espressif/esp-dev-kits

Default branch master · commit 77a138da · scanned 6/6/2026, 10:22:54 PM

GitHub: 584 stars · 250 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
22 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
1 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface espressif/esp-dev-kits, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • hightopics#1
    Add relevant topics to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    esp32, esp-idf, development-boards, dev-kits, schematics, firmware, user-guides, iot, microcontroller, embedded-systems, hardware-design, espressif
  • highreadme#2
    Strengthen the README's H1 to emphasize its role as a central resource hub

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # esp-dev-kits
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # Espressif ESP Development Kits: Documentation, Schematics, Firmware, and Hardware Resources
  • mediumhomepage#3
    Add a homepage URL to the repository metadata

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://docs.espressif.com/projects/esp-dev-kits/en/latest/

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface espressif/esp-dev-kits
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
ESP-IDF
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. ESP-IDF · recommended 2×
  2. Espressif Systems · recommended 1×
  3. Arduino · recommended 1×
  4. Arduino IDE · recommended 1×
  5. Raspberry Pi Foundation · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to find documentation and firmware for common IoT microcontroller development boards?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Espressif Systems
    2. ESP-IDF
    3. Arduino
    4. Arduino IDE
    5. Raspberry Pi Foundation
    6. MicroPython
    7. Adafruit
    8. SparkFun
    9. STMicroelectronics
    10. STM32CubeIDE
    11. CubeMX
    12. ESP-AT firmware
    13. PlatformIO
    14. Mbed OS
    15. ESP32.com Forum
    16. Arduino Forum
    17. Raspberry Pi Forums
    18. Hackaday.io
    19. Instructables
    20. All About Circuits
    21. Digi-Key
    22. Mouser

    AI recommended 22 alternatives but never named espressif/esp-dev-kits. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Where to get schematics and user guides for popular Wi-Fi enabled embedded system kits?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Espressif Systems Documentation
    2. ESP-IDF
    3. Adafruit Learning System
    4. SparkFun Learn
    5. Arduino Documentation
    6. Seeed Studio Wiki
    7. GitHub Repositories
    8. Manufacturer's Product Pages

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named espressif/esp-dev-kits. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of espressif/esp-dev-kits?
    pass
    AI did not name espressif/esp-dev-kits — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts espressif/esp-dev-kits in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named espressif/esp-dev-kits explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo espressif/esp-dev-kits solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name espressif/esp-dev-kits — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of espressif/esp-dev-kits. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/espressif/esp-dev-kits.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/espressif/esp-dev-kits)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/espressif/esp-dev-kits"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/espressif/esp-dev-kits.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

espressif/esp-dev-kits — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite