RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

fabro-sh/fabro

Default branch main · commit 23d36447 · scanned 6/12/2026, 7:26:52 AM

GitHub: 920 stars · 101 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
28 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface fabro-sh/fabro, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • hightopics#1
    Add relevant topics to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ai-agents, workflow-orchestration, llm-agents, generative-ai, devops-automation, software-factory, developer-tools, automation
  • highabout#2
    Update the repository description for clarity

    Why:

    CURRENT
    ⚒️ The open source dark software factory for expert engineers.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ⚒️ Orchestrate AI coding agents and automate software development workflows with Fabro, the open source dark software factory for expert engineers.
  • mediumreadme#3
    Expand 'Why Fabro?' section in README with explicit differentiators

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Consider adding a sentence to the 'Why Fabro?' section, such as: 'While tools like LangChain and AutoGen provide agent frameworks, Fabro uniquely focuses on defining robust, version-controlled workflows as graphs, ensuring predictable execution and precise human intervention points.'

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface fabro-sh/fabro
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
langchain-ai/langchain
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. langchain-ai/langchain · recommended 1×
  2. microsoft/autogen · recommended 1×
  3. apache/airflow · recommended 1×
  4. PrefectHQ/prefect · recommended 1×
  5. temporalio/temporal · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to orchestrate AI coding agents through defined workflows with human intervention points?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain with LangGraph (langchain-ai/langchain)
    2. AutoGen (microsoft/autogen)
    3. Apache Airflow (apache/airflow)
    4. Prefect (PrefectHQ/prefect)
    5. Temporal (temporalio/temporal)

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named fabro-sh/fabro. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What tools help automate software development processes using AI with reduced manual oversight?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. GitHub Copilot
    2. Tabnine
    3. DeepCode AI
    4. CodiumAI
    5. Mendix Assist
    6. AWS CodeGuru
    7. Google Cloud AI Platform

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named fabro-sh/fabro. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of fabro-sh/fabro?
    pass
    AI named fabro-sh/fabro explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts fabro-sh/fabro in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named fabro-sh/fabro explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo fabro-sh/fabro solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name fabro-sh/fabro — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of fabro-sh/fabro. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/fabro-sh/fabro.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/fabro-sh/fabro)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/fabro-sh/fabro"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/fabro-sh/fabro.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

fabro-sh/fabro — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite