RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

fatihak/InkyPi

Default branch main · commit 73c21a1b · scanned 6/24/2026, 5:48:00 AM

GitHub: 4,044 stars · 540 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface fatihak/InkyPi, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README's opening sentence to emphasize 'complete application' and 'dashboard'

    Why:

    CURRENT
    InkyPi is an open-source, customizable E-Ink display powered by a Raspberry Pi. Designed for simplicity and flexibility, it allows you to effortlessly display the content you care about, with a simple web interface that makes setup and configuration effortless.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    InkyPi is a complete, open-source application that transforms your Raspberry Pi and E-Ink display into a customizable smart dashboard, managed effortlessly via a simple web interface.
  • highhomepage#2
    Add a homepage URL to the repository metadata

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a URL to a dedicated documentation site or GitHub Pages for InkyPi (e.g., `https://fatihak.github.io/InkyPi/` if using GitHub Pages).
  • mediumreadme#3
    Add a sentence to the 'About InkyPi' section clarifying its differentiation from lower-level solutions

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add this sentence to the 'About InkyPi' section: 'Unlike basic scripts or hardware libraries, InkyPi provides a full-featured, web-managed application layer, making it easy for anyone to create a dynamic e-paper display without deep coding knowledge.'

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface fatihak/InkyPi
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Waveshare 2.13inch e-Paper HAT
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Waveshare 2.13inch e-Paper HAT · recommended 1×
  2. Waveshare 7.5inch e-Paper HAT (B) · recommended 1×
  3. Waveshare Python libraries · recommended 1×
  4. Flask · recommended 1×
  5. Inky pHAT · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I set up an e-ink display for Raspberry Pi with a web-based interface?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Waveshare 2.13inch e-Paper HAT
    2. Waveshare 7.5inch e-Paper HAT (B)
    3. Waveshare Python libraries
    4. Flask
    5. Inky pHAT
    6. Inky wHAT
    7. inky Python library
    8. Django
    9. Adafruit 2.13" Tri-Color eInk Display Breakout
    10. Adafruit 2.9" Grayscale eInk Display Breakout
    11. CircuitPython libraries
    12. Adafruit_CircuitPython_EPD
    13. FastAPI
    14. GDEW0154T8
    15. GDEW029T5
    16. Bottle
    17. CherryPy

    AI recommended 17 alternatives but never named fatihak/InkyPi. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What open-source projects exist for displaying dynamic information on an e-paper screen?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. OpenEPaperLink
    2. ESP-IDF
    3. GxEPD2
    4. Inky pHAT/wHAT libraries (Pimoroni)
    5. PaperTTY

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named fatihak/InkyPi. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of fatihak/InkyPi?
    pass
    AI named fatihak/InkyPi explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts fatihak/InkyPi in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named fatihak/InkyPi explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo fatihak/InkyPi solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named fatihak/InkyPi explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of fatihak/InkyPi. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/fatihak/InkyPi.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/fatihak/InkyPi)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/fatihak/InkyPi"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/fatihak/InkyPi.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

fatihak/InkyPi — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite