RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

fengshao1227/ccg-workflow

Default branch main · commit fd7bf3ec · scanned 5/16/2026, 4:49:17 AM

GitHub: 5,120 stars · 395 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
33 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface fengshao1227/ccg-workflow, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highabout#1
    Translate the repository description to English

    Why:

    CURRENT
    多模型协作开发系统 - Claude 编排 + Codex 后端 + Gemini 前端,28 个命令覆盖开发全流程,一键安装零配置
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    A multi-model collaborative development system: Claude orchestrates Codex (backend) and Gemini (frontend), with 28 commands covering the full development process, zero-config one-click installation.
  • mediumtopics#2
    Add specific topics for AI orchestration and secure software development

    Why:

    CURRENT
    agent-teams, ai, ccg, claude-code, cli, codex, gemini, llm, no-de, nodejs, opsxspec, prompt, workflow
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    agent-teams, ai, ccg, claude-code, cli, codex, gemini, llm, no-de, nodejs, opsxspec, prompt, workflow, ai-orchestration, software-development, secure-ai, automated-code-review, multi-agent-system
  • lowreadme#3
    Strengthen the README's opening to explicitly state its core function

    Why:

    CURRENT
    A multi-model collaboration development system where Claude Code orchestrates Codex + Gemini. Frontend tasks route to Gemini, backend tasks route to Codex, and Claude handles orchestration and code review.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    CCG-workflow is an AI agent orchestration platform for secure, spec-driven software development. It enables multi-model collaboration, with Claude Code orchestrating specialized agents like Codex for backend tasks and Gemini for frontend, and handling automated code review. This system covers the entire development lifecycle with 29+ slash commands, offering zero-config setup.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface fengshao1227/ccg-workflow
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
LangChain
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. LangChain · recommended 1×
  2. LlamaIndex · recommended 1×
  3. OpenAI Assistants API · recommended 1×
  4. Microsoft Semantic Kernel · recommended 1×
  5. Haystack · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to orchestrate multiple AI models for collaborative software development tasks?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain
    2. LlamaIndex
    3. OpenAI Assistants API
    4. Microsoft Semantic Kernel
    5. Haystack
    6. FastAPI
    7. Flask
    8. Celery
    9. Prefect

    AI recommended 9 alternatives but never named fengshao1227/ccg-workflow. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Tool for secure AI agent-driven software development with automated code review?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. GitHub Copilot Enterprise
    2. GitHub Advanced Security
    3. GitLab Ultimate
    4. CodiumAI
    5. Snyk
    6. Snyk Code
    7. Checkmarx One
    8. Checkmarx AI Security
    9. DeepSource

    AI recommended 9 alternatives but never named fengshao1227/ccg-workflow. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of fengshao1227/ccg-workflow?
    pass
    AI named fengshao1227/ccg-workflow explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts fengshao1227/ccg-workflow in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named fengshao1227/ccg-workflow explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo fengshao1227/ccg-workflow solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name fengshao1227/ccg-workflow — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of fengshao1227/ccg-workflow. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/fengshao1227/ccg-workflow.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/fengshao1227/ccg-workflow)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/fengshao1227/ccg-workflow"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/fengshao1227/ccg-workflow.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

fengshao1227/ccg-workflow — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite