RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

firecrawl/firegeo

Default branch main · commit 5bef51fe · scanned 6/1/2026, 4:38:15 AM

GitHub: 631 stars · 210 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface firecrawl/firegeo, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README H1 to clarify "GEO" and prevent misinterpretation

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # FireGEO Open-Source SaaS Starter
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # FireGEO: Open-Source SaaS Starter for Generative Engine Optimization
  • hightopics#2
    Add relevant topics to improve categorization

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    saas-starter, nextjs, typescript, postgresql, authentication, billing, brand-monitoring, ai-chat, boilerplate, fullstack, geo-optimization
  • mediumhomepage#3
    Add a homepage URL

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    [Link to a live demo or the main FireGEO project page]

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface firecrawl/firegeo
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
ShipFast
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. ShipFast · recommended 1×
  2. SaaS Starter Kit (by Vercel) · recommended 1×
  3. Supabase Next.js SaaS Starter · recommended 1×
  4. Next.js SaaS Boilerplate (by Saas UI) · recommended 1×
  5. Bulletproof Next.js · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for a Next.js boilerplate to quickly launch a SaaS with authentication and billing.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. ShipFast
    2. SaaS Starter Kit (by Vercel)
    3. Supabase Next.js SaaS Starter
    4. Next.js SaaS Boilerplate (by Saas UI)
    5. Bulletproof Next.js
    6. T3 Stack (create-t3-app)

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named firecrawl/firegeo. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Need a full-stack starter kit for a SaaS product including brand monitoring and AI chat.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Next.js (vercel/next.js)
    2. Vercel
    3. Supabase (supabase/supabase)
    4. OpenAI API
    5. Brandwatch
    6. Mention
    7. Awario
    8. Remix (remix-run/remix)
    9. Fly.io
    10. PostgreSQL
    11. Anthropic Claude API
    12. Nuxt.js (nuxt/nuxt)
    13. Netlify
    14. Firebase
    15. Google Cloud AI (Vertex AI/PaLM API)
    16. Ruby on Rails (rails/rails)
    17. Heroku
    18. Cohere API
    19. Django (django/django)
    20. DigitalOcean App Platform
    21. Hugging Face Inference API

    AI recommended 21 alternatives but never named firecrawl/firegeo. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of firecrawl/firegeo?
    pass
    AI named firecrawl/firegeo explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts firecrawl/firegeo in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named firecrawl/firegeo explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo firecrawl/firegeo solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named firecrawl/firegeo explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of firecrawl/firegeo. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/firecrawl/firegeo.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/firecrawl/firegeo)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/firecrawl/firegeo"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/firecrawl/firegeo.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

firecrawl/firegeo — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite