RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

fishjar/kiss-translator

Default branch dev · commit bd84c47e · scanned 6/17/2026, 5:51:56 PM

GitHub: 10,771 stars · 479 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
40 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface fishjar/kiss-translator, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Clarify project type in README's opening sentence

    Why:

    CURRENT
    一个简约、开源的 双语对照翻译扩展 & 油猴脚本。
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    KISS Translator is a simple, open-source **browser extension and Greasemonkey userscript** for seamless bilingual translation directly in your web browser. **It is not a desktop application.**
  • mediumreadme#2
    Highlight core use case in README's introduction

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    It excels at providing **real-time bilingual translation for entire webpages**, alongside features like selection and input box translation.
  • lowreadme#3
    Emphasize broad translation service support in README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    KISS Translator stands out with its **broad and extensible support for multiple translation services**, including traditional providers and advanced AI models like OpenAI, Gemini, and Claude.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface fishjar/kiss-translator
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Google Translate
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Google Translate · recommended 2×
  2. Microsoft Translator · recommended 2×
  3. DeepL Translate · recommended 1×
  4. Mate Translate · recommended 1×
  5. ImTranslator: Translator, Dictionary, TTS · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to find a browser extension for real-time bilingual webpage content translation?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Google Translate
    2. DeepL Translate
    3. Microsoft Translator
    4. Mate Translate
    5. ImTranslator: Translator, Dictionary, TTS
    6. Reverso Context

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named fishjar/kiss-translator. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What open-source userscript provides comparative translation using multiple AI services?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Translate Web Pages (by Fxhiu)
    2. Google Translate
    3. DeepL
    4. Microsoft Translator
    5. Translate Selected Text (by S.L.)
    6. Bing
    7. Google Translate Multi-Service
    8. DeepL Translator Userscript (Various Authors)

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named fishjar/kiss-translator. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of fishjar/kiss-translator?
    pass
    AI named fishjar/kiss-translator explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts fishjar/kiss-translator in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named fishjar/kiss-translator explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo fishjar/kiss-translator solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named fishjar/kiss-translator explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of fishjar/kiss-translator. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/fishjar/kiss-translator.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/fishjar/kiss-translator)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/fishjar/kiss-translator"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/fishjar/kiss-translator.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

fishjar/kiss-translator — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite