RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

fynnfluegge/agtx

Default branch main · commit c6460265 · scanned 5/30/2026, 6:38:01 AM

GitHub: 1,059 stars · 97 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface fynnfluegge/agtx, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Clarify the project's core category in the README H1

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # 🏄🏼‍♂️ agtx
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # 🏄🏼‍♂️ agtx: Multi-Agent Orchestration for AI Coding Workflows
  • mediumtopics#2
    Add category-defining topics to improve AI recommendation

    Why:

    CURRENT
    claude, claude-code, codex, cursor, gemini, opencode, spec-driven-development, vibe-coding
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    claude, claude-code, codex, cursor, gemini, opencode, spec-driven-development, vibe-coding, multi-agent-system, ai-orchestration, agent-framework, ai-coding-assistant, developer-tools
  • lowhomepage#3
    Add the repository URL as the project homepage

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://github.com/fynnfluegge/agtx

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface fynnfluegge/agtx
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT · recommended 1×
  2. langchain-ai/langchain · recommended 1×
  3. joaomdmoura/crewAI · recommended 1×
  4. OpenAI Assistants API · recommended 1×
  5. Hugging Face Agents · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I coordinate multiple AI coding agents to collaborate on a complex software development task?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. AutoGPT (Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT)
    2. LangChain (langchain-ai/langchain)
    3. CrewAI (joaomdmoura/crewAI)
    4. OpenAI Assistants API
    5. Hugging Face Agents
    6. Semantic Kernel (microsoft/semantic-kernel)

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named fynnfluegge/agtx. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Tool for managing context and delegating tasks among various AI coding models during development?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain
    2. LlamaIndex
    3. Haystack
    4. AutoGPT
    5. BabyAGI
    6. CrewAI
    7. Microsoft Semantic Kernel

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named fynnfluegge/agtx. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of fynnfluegge/agtx?
    pass
    AI named fynnfluegge/agtx explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts fynnfluegge/agtx in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named fynnfluegge/agtx explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo fynnfluegge/agtx solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named fynnfluegge/agtx explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of fynnfluegge/agtx. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/fynnfluegge/agtx.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/fynnfluegge/agtx)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/fynnfluegge/agtx"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/fynnfluegge/agtx.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

fynnfluegge/agtx — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite