RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

gemini-cli-extensions/code-review

Default branch main · commit dd1a10d2 · scanned 6/1/2026, 10:07:53 AM

GitHub: 516 stars · 37 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
22 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
1 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface gemini-cli-extensions/code-review, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README's opening sentence to highlight AI-powered code review

    Why:

    CURRENT
    The Code Review extension is an open-source Gemini CLI extension, built to enhance your repository's code quality.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    The Code Review extension is an open-source, **AI-powered** Gemini CLI extension, built to enhance your repository's code quality by providing **Gemini-driven** code reviews directly from your command line.
  • hightopics#2
    Add descriptive topics for AI code review and code quality

    Why:

    CURRENT
    gemini, gemini-cli, gemini-cli-extensions
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    gemini, gemini-cli, gemini-cli-extensions, ai-code-review, code-quality, cli-tool, pull-request-review, generative-ai
  • mediumhomepage#3
    Add a homepage URL to the repository metadata

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://github.com/gemini-cli-extensions/code-review

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface gemini-cli-extensions/code-review
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
GitHub Actions
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. GitHub Actions · recommended 1×
  2. GitLab CI/CD · recommended 1×
  3. jenkinsci/jenkins · recommended 1×
  4. CircleCI · recommended 1×
  5. Travis CI · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to get automated feedback on code changes to improve overall quality?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. GitHub Actions
    2. GitLab CI/CD
    3. Jenkins (jenkinsci/jenkins)
    4. CircleCI
    5. Travis CI
    6. SonarQube (SonarSource/sonarqube)
    7. SonarCloud
    8. ESLint (eslint/eslint)
    9. Black (psf/black)
    10. Prettier (prettier/prettier)
    11. Snyk
    12. Dependabot
    13. Renovate (renovatebot/renovate)
    14. Code Climate
    15. Codacy
    16. Jest (jestjs/jest)
    17. Pytest (pytest-dev/pytest)
    18. JUnit (junit-team/junit5)
    19. Cypress (cypress-io/cypress)
    20. Selenium (SeleniumHQ/selenium)
    21. Playwright (microsoft/playwright)

    AI recommended 21 alternatives but never named gemini-cli-extensions/code-review. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What command-line tools offer AI-powered code review for pull requests?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. GitHub Copilot CLI
    2. CodeRabbit CLI
    3. Snyk Code CLI
    4. GitLab Duo Code Suggestions
    5. OpenAI API
    6. Anthropic API
    7. Reviewdog (reviewdog/reviewdog)

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named gemini-cli-extensions/code-review. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of gemini-cli-extensions/code-review?
    pass
    AI did not name gemini-cli-extensions/code-review — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts gemini-cli-extensions/code-review in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named gemini-cli-extensions/code-review explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo gemini-cli-extensions/code-review solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name gemini-cli-extensions/code-review — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of gemini-cli-extensions/code-review. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/gemini-cli-extensions/code-review.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/gemini-cli-extensions/code-review)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/gemini-cli-extensions/code-review"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/gemini-cli-extensions/code-review.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

gemini-cli-extensions/code-review — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite