RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

gerstung-lab/Delphi

Default branch main · commit 3e6770e1 · scanned 6/24/2026, 12:22:57 AM

GitHub: 500 stars · 118 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface gerstung-lab/Delphi, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • hightopics#1
    Add specific topics to improve categorization

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    health-trajectories, generative-ai, transformers, disease-progression, longitudinal-data, deep-learning, pytorch, causal-inference, biomedicine
  • highreadme#2
    Add a concise project summary immediately after the main title

    Why:

    CURRENT
    ## Learning the natural history of human disease with generative transformers
    
    [`Paper`] [[`BibTeX`](#Citation)]
    
    Artem Shmatko*, Alexander Wolfgang Jung*, Kumar Gaurav*, Søren Brunak, Laust Mortensen, Ewan Birney, Tom Fitzgerald, Moritz Gerstung (*Equal Contribution)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ## Learning the natural history of human disease with generative transformers
    
    Delphi is a PyTorch-based generative transformer model designed to learn and simulate the natural history of human disease from longitudinal patient data, enabling insights into health trajectories and disease progression.
    
    [`Paper`] [[`BibTeX`](#Citation)]
    
    Artem Shmatko*, Alexander Wolfgang Jung*, Kumar Gaurav*, Søren Brunak, Laust Mortensen, Ewan Birney, Tom Fitzgerald, Moritz Gerstung (*Equal Contribution)
  • mediumhomepage#3
    Add a homepage URL to the repository metadata

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-07179-w (or the official paper URL)

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface gerstung-lab/Delphi
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
AlphaFold
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. AlphaFold · recommended 1×
  2. Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) · recommended 1×
  3. Conditional GANs (cGANs) · recommended 1×
  4. Time-series GANs (T-GANs) · recommended 1×
  5. MedGAN · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are effective generative AI models for simulating and predicting human health trajectories?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. AlphaFold
    2. Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs)
    3. Conditional GANs (cGANs)
    4. Time-series GANs (T-GANs)
    5. MedGAN
    6. Variational Autoencoders (VAEs)
    7. Conditional VAEs (CVAEs)
    8. Recurrent VAEs (RVAEs)
    9. Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs)
    10. LSTMs
    11. GRUs
    12. Transformers
    13. Diffusion Models
    14. Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models (DDPMs)
    15. Reinforcement Learning (RL)
    16. Deep Q-Networks (DQN)
    17. Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO)

    AI recommended 17 alternatives but never named gerstung-lab/Delphi. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I apply transformer models to analyze longitudinal patient data for disease progression?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Hugging Face Transformers
    2. PyTorch
    3. TensorFlow
    4. Keras
    5. DeepMind's AlphaFold
    6. Google's Trajectory Transformer

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named gerstung-lab/Delphi. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of gerstung-lab/Delphi?
    pass
    AI named gerstung-lab/Delphi explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts gerstung-lab/Delphi in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named gerstung-lab/Delphi explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo gerstung-lab/Delphi solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named gerstung-lab/Delphi explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of gerstung-lab/Delphi. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/gerstung-lab/Delphi.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/gerstung-lab/Delphi)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/gerstung-lab/Delphi"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/gerstung-lab/Delphi.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

gerstung-lab/Delphi — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite