RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

gety-ai/apple-on-device-openai

Default branch main · commit 31a2d9b9 · scanned 5/30/2026, 10:52:00 AM

GitHub: 865 stars · 60 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
17 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 0 warn · 1 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
1 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface gety-ai/apple-on-device-openai, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Clarify README's opening sentence to emphasize Apple Intelligence exclusivity

    Why:

    CURRENT
    A SwiftUI application that creates an OpenAI-compatible API server using Apple's on-device Foundation Models.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    This SwiftUI application provides an OpenAI-compatible API server exclusively for Apple's on-device Foundation Models, enabling local access to Apple Intelligence.
  • hightopics#2
    Add specific topics to improve categorization

    Why:

    CURRENT
    (none)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    apple-intelligence, on-device-ai, openai-api-compatible, swiftui, macos, foundation-models
  • mediumlicense#3
    Add a LICENSE file to clarify usage terms

    Why:

    CURRENT
    (no LICENSE file detected)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a LICENSE file in the repository root with the MIT License text.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface gety-ai/apple-on-device-openai
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Ollama
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Ollama · recommended 2×
  2. LocalAI · recommended 2×
  3. LM Studio · recommended 1×
  4. Jan · recommended 1×
  5. text-generation-webui · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to run large language models locally on macOS with an OpenAI-compatible interface?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Ollama
    2. LM Studio
    3. LocalAI
    4. Jan
    5. text-generation-webui
    6. llama.cpp

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named gety-ai/apple-on-device-openai. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Tool to access Apple Intelligence models through a standard OpenAI API endpoint?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. OpenAI API
    2. GPT-4o
    3. GPT-4
    4. GPT-3.5 Turbo
    5. MLX
    6. FastAPI
    7. Flask
    8. Core ML
    9. GCDWebServer
    10. LocalAI
    11. Ollama

    AI recommended 11 alternatives but never named gety-ai/apple-on-device-openai. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    fail

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of gety-ai/apple-on-device-openai?
    pass
    AI did not name gety-ai/apple-on-device-openai — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts gety-ai/apple-on-device-openai in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named gety-ai/apple-on-device-openai explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo gety-ai/apple-on-device-openai solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name gety-ai/apple-on-device-openai — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of gety-ai/apple-on-device-openai. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/gety-ai/apple-on-device-openai.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/gety-ai/apple-on-device-openai)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/gety-ai/apple-on-device-openai"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/gety-ai/apple-on-device-openai.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

gety-ai/apple-on-device-openai — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite