RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

glink25/Cent

Default branch main · commit c2e16b31 · scanned 6/23/2026, 9:33:04 AM

GitHub: 1,108 stars · 269 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
40 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface glink25/Cent, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Add a clear category tagline to the README's opening

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # Cent
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # Cent: Free, Open-Source, Collaborative PWA Accounting App
  • mediumcomparison#2
    Add a 'Why Cent?' or 'Comparison' section to the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a section (e.g., 'Why Cent?') that briefly outlines Cent's advantages over typical alternatives, focusing on its PWA nature, GitHub/Gitee data sync, AI features, and collaborative aspects.
  • lowlicense#3
    Clarify project license in the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a 'License' section to the README, stating the specific license(s) that apply to the project (e.g., 'This project is licensed under [License Name/Type]. See the LICENSE file for details.').

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface glink25/Cent
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
GnuCash
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. GnuCash · recommended 1×
  2. Nextcloud · recommended 1×
  3. Syncthing · recommended 1×
  4. Firefly III · recommended 1×
  5. Akaunting · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for an open-source collaborative accounting app with self-hosted data storage.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. GnuCash
    2. Nextcloud
    3. Syncthing
    4. Firefly III
    5. Akaunting
    6. InvoicePlane
    7. KMyMoney
    8. Ledger
    9. hledger
    10. beancount
    11. Git

    AI recommended 11 alternatives but never named glink25/Cent. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are good PWA personal finance trackers offering AI-powered expense analysis?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Copilot Money
    2. Monarch Money
    3. Simplifi by Quicken
    4. Rocket Money
    5. You Need A Budget (YNAB)
    6. PocketGuard

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named glink25/Cent. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of glink25/Cent?
    pass
    AI named glink25/Cent explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts glink25/Cent in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named glink25/Cent explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo glink25/Cent solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named glink25/Cent explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of glink25/Cent. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/glink25/Cent.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/glink25/Cent)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/glink25/Cent"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/glink25/Cent.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

glink25/Cent — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite