RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

glink25/Cent

Default branch main · commit 9aef6a8f · scanned 5/13/2026, 12:47:42 AM

GitHub: 1,035 stars · 247 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
40 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface glink25/Cent, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Add a clear English positioning statement to the README's opening

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # Cent

简体中文 | [English](./README_EN.md)

> 你可能只需要一个记账软件。
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # Cent

Completely free, open-source, collaborative accounting Web App.

简体中文 | [English](./README_EN.md)

> 你可能只需要一个记账软件。
  • mediumtopics#2
    Expand repository topics to improve category visibility

    Why:

    CURRENT
    accounting, pwa
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    accounting, pwa, personal-finance, budgeting, expense-tracker, ai, self-hosted, collaboration
  • lowreadme#3
    Clarify the project's license in the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a section like '## License' to your README, stating clearly which license(s) apply to the project, e.g., 'This project is licensed under [License Name(s)] - see the LICENSE file for details.'

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface glink25/Cent
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
actualbudget/actual
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. actualbudget/actual · recommended 2×
  2. firefly-iii/firefly-iii · recommended 2×
  3. HomeBank · recommended 1×
  4. BudgetBakers Wallet · recommended 1×
  5. GnuCash · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are the best open-source web apps for collaborative personal finance tracking?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Actual Budget (actualbudget/actual)
    2. Firefly III (firefly-iii/firefly-iii)
    3. HomeBank
    4. BudgetBakers Wallet
    5. GnuCash

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named glink25/Cent. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for a PWA expense tracker with AI features and self-hosted data storage.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Actual Budget (actualbudget/actual)
    2. OpenAI's API
    3. Firefly III (firefly-iii/firefly-iii)
    4. spaCy (explosion/spaCy)
    5. HomeBank (HomeBank/HomeBank)
    6. Nativefier (nativefier/nativefier)
    7. Wallet by BudgetBakers
    8. IFTTT
    9. Zapier
    10. Ledger (ledger/ledger)
    11. Beancount (beancount/beancount)
    12. VS Code (microsoft/vscode)

    AI recommended 12 alternatives but never named glink25/Cent. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of glink25/Cent?
    pass
    AI named glink25/Cent explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts glink25/Cent in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named glink25/Cent explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo glink25/Cent solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named glink25/Cent explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of glink25/Cent. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/glink25/Cent.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/glink25/Cent)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/glink25/Cent"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/glink25/Cent.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

glink25/Cent — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite