RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

gongminmin/awesome-aigc

Default branch main · commit 086c1328 · scanned 6/2/2026, 9:37:57 AM

GitHub: 565 stars · 45 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
22 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
1 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface gongminmin/awesome-aigc, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README's opening to clarify repo type

    Why:

    CURRENT
    A list of awesome AIGC works.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    A curated directory of awesome AIGC tools, platforms, and resources, categorized by media type and maturity (TRL).
  • mediumabout#2
    Add a homepage URL to the About section

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://github.com/gongminmin/awesome-aigc
  • lowabout#3
    Refine the About section description

    Why:

    CURRENT
    A list of awesome AIGC works
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    A curated, categorized directory of awesome AIGC tools, platforms, and resources, evaluated by Technology Readiness Level (TRL).

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface gongminmin/awesome-aigc
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
HeyGen
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. HeyGen · recommended 2×
  2. OpenAI GPT-3 / GPT-4 · recommended 1×
  3. Anthropic Claude · recommended 1×
  4. Google Bard · recommended 1×
  5. Jasper · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are the leading AI generative content tools available for different media types?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. OpenAI GPT-3 / GPT-4
    2. Anthropic Claude
    3. Google Bard
    4. Jasper
    5. Copy.ai
    6. Midjourney
    7. Stable Diffusion
    8. DALL-E 3
    9. Adobe Firefly
    10. Leonardo.Ai
    11. RunwayML Gen-2
    12. Pika Labs
    13. HeyGen
    14. Synthesys
    15. DeepMotion
    16. Suno AI
    17. ElevenLabs
    18. AIVA
    19. Soundraw
    20. MusicLM
    21. Luma AI
    22. Blockade Labs
    23. Spline
    24. Meshy
    25. Kaedim

    AI recommended 25 alternatives but never named gongminmin/awesome-aigc. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Where can I find a curated list of mature text-to-video generation platforms?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Synthesys X
    2. Pictory
    3. HeyGen
    4. Descript
    5. InVideo
    6. FlexClip
    7. Lumen5

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named gongminmin/awesome-aigc. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of gongminmin/awesome-aigc?
    pass
    AI did not name gongminmin/awesome-aigc — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts gongminmin/awesome-aigc in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named gongminmin/awesome-aigc explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo gongminmin/awesome-aigc solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name gongminmin/awesome-aigc — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of gongminmin/awesome-aigc. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/gongminmin/awesome-aigc.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/gongminmin/awesome-aigc)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/gongminmin/awesome-aigc"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/gongminmin/awesome-aigc.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

gongminmin/awesome-aigc — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite