RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

google-research/batch-ppo

Default branch master · commit 3d097059 · scanned 6/2/2026, 10:01:54 PM

GitHub: 977 stars · 148 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
22 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
1 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface google-research/batch-ppo, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Clarify README opening to emphasize TensorFlow and infrastructure role

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Batch PPO This project provides optimized infrastructure for reinforcement learning. It extends the [OpenAI gym interface][post-gym] to multiple parallel environments and allows agents to be implemented in TensorFlow and perform batched computation. As a starting point, we provide BatchPPO, an optimized implementation of [Proximal Policy Optimization][post-ppo].
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Batch PPO is a Google Research project providing optimized **TensorFlow-based infrastructure** for **efficient batched reinforcement learning**. It extends the [OpenAI gym interface][post-gym] to multiple parallel environments, enabling agents to perform batched computation. While it includes an optimized implementation of [Proximal Policy Optimization][post-ppo] (BatchPPO) as a starting point, its primary focus is on the underlying infrastructure.
  • mediumhomepage#2
    Add a homepage URL

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://github.com/google-research/batch-ppo
  • mediumtopics#3
    Expand topics to include parallel/distributed RL

    Why:

    CURRENT
    artificial-intelligence, control, multi-processing, python, reinforcement-learning, tensorflow, vectorized-computation
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    artificial-intelligence, control, multi-processing, python, reinforcement-learning, tensorflow, vectorized-computation, parallel-reinforcement-learning, distributed-reinforcement-learning, batched-reinforcement-learning

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface google-research/batch-ppo
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
ray-project/ray
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. ray-project/ray · recommended 2×
  2. RLlib · recommended 1×
  3. Stable Baselines3 · recommended 1×
  4. Acme · recommended 1×
  5. Tianshou · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for a Python library to perform efficient batched reinforcement learning experiments.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. RLlib
    2. Stable Baselines3
    3. Acme
    4. Tianshou
    5. CleanRL

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named google-research/batch-ppo. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to implement parallel reinforcement learning agents with vectorized environments for faster training?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. RLlib (ray-project/ray)
    2. Ray (ray-project/ray)
    3. Stable Baselines3 (DLR-RM/stable-baselines3)
    4. CleanRL (vwxyzjn/cleanrl)
    5. Gymnasium (Farama-Foundation/Gymnasium)
    6. TorchRL (pytorch/rl)
    7. Tianshou (thu-ml/tianshou)
    8. Acme (deepmind/acme)

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named google-research/batch-ppo. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of google-research/batch-ppo?
    pass
    AI did not name google-research/batch-ppo — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts google-research/batch-ppo in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named google-research/batch-ppo explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo google-research/batch-ppo solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name google-research/batch-ppo — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of google-research/batch-ppo. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/google-research/batch-ppo.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/google-research/batch-ppo)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/google-research/batch-ppo"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/google-research/batch-ppo.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

google-research/batch-ppo — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite