REPOGEO REPORT · LITE
guaguaguaxia/weekly_report
Default branch main · commit 5b95c758 · scanned 6/21/2026, 5:17:40 PM
GitHub: 3,237 stars · 479 forks
Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.
2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).
Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface guaguaguaxia/weekly_report, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.
Action plan — copy-paste fixes
3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.
- highreadme#1Reposition the README H1 to specify category and function
Why:
CURRENT# Weekly Report ## [English](README_EN.md) 简单描述工作内容,帮你生成完整周报
COPY-PASTE FIX# AI 周报生成器 (AI Weekly Report Generator) 简单描述工作内容,帮你生成完整周报。本项目利用 OpenAI GPT-3.5 API 自动将你的工作内容总结为结构化的周报。 ## [English](README_EN.md)
- hightopics#2Add relevant topics to the repository
Why:
CURRENT(none)
COPY-PASTE FIXai, gpt, gpt-3.5, weekly-report, report-generator, vercel, openai, productivity, work-summary, markdown
- highlicense#3Add a LICENSE file and mention it in the README
Why:
CURRENT(no LICENSE file detected)
COPY-PASTE FIXCreate a `LICENSE` file in the repository root with the MIT License text. Then, add a section to the README, for example, `## License` stating: `This project is licensed under the MIT License - see the [LICENSE](LICENSE) file for details.`
Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash
Category visibility — the real GEO test
Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?
Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.
- ChatGPT · recommended 2×
- Claude · recommended 2×
- Google Gemini · recommended 1×
- Microsoft Word · recommended 1×
- Google Docs · recommended 1×
- CATEGORY QUERYHow can I quickly generate professional weekly work reports from brief notes?you: not recommendedAI recommended (in order):
- ChatGPT
- Claude
- Google Gemini
- Microsoft Word
- Google Docs
- Template Gallery
- Doc Builder
- Notion
- ClickUp
- Asana
- Jira
- TextExpander
- Alfred
- Keyboard Maestro
- Zapier
- Make
AI recommended 16 alternatives but never named guaguaguaxia/weekly_report. This is the gap to close.
Show full AI answer
- CATEGORY QUERYLooking for an AI tool to help summarize my work activities into a structured report.you: not recommendedAI recommended (in order):
- Notion AI
- ChatGPT
- Claude
- ScribeHow
- Fireflies.ai
- Otter.ai
- Microsoft Copilot
AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named guaguaguaxia/weekly_report. This is the gap to close.
Show full AI answer
Objective checks
Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.
- Metadata completenesswarn
Suggestion:
- README presencepass
Self-mention check
Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?
- Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of guaguaguaxia/weekly_report?passAI did not name guaguaguaxia/weekly_report — likely talking about a different project
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?
- If a team adopts guaguaguaxia/weekly_report in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?passAI named guaguaguaxia/weekly_report explicitly
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?
- In one sentence, what problem does the repo guaguaguaxia/weekly_report solve, and who is the primary audience?passAI did not name guaguaguaxia/weekly_report — likely talking about a different project
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?
Embed your GEO score
Drop this badge into the README of guaguaguaxia/weekly_report. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.
[](https://repogeo.com/en/r/guaguaguaxia/weekly_report)<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/guaguaguaxia/weekly_report"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/guaguaguaxia/weekly_report.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses
guaguaguaxia/weekly_report — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.
- Deep reports10 / month
- Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
- Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite