RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

gyoridavid/ai_agents_az

Default branch main · commit 764fac22 · scanned 6/22/2026, 10:28:52 AM

GitHub: 3,814 stars · 928 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
22 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
1 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface gyoridavid/ai_agents_az, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highabout#1
    Add a clear, concise description for the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    n8n workflow templates for building diverse AI agents, covering content generation, social media automation, research, and video creation.
  • highlicense#2
    Add a LICENSE file to the repository

    Why:

    CURRENT
    (no LICENSE file detected — the repo has no recognizable license)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a LICENSE file in the repository root with your chosen open-source license (e.g., MIT, Apache-2.0).
  • mediumtopics#3
    Expand repository topics to improve category visibility

    Why:

    CURRENT
    n8n, n8n-workflow, workflows
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    n8n, n8n-workflow, workflows, ai-agents, automation, content-generation, social-media, video-creation, deep-research, ai-workflows

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface gyoridavid/ai_agents_az
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Jasper
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Jasper · recommended 2×
  2. Copy.ai · recommended 2×
  3. Buffer AI Assistant · recommended 2×
  4. Hootsuite AI · recommended 2×
  5. Sprout Social · recommended 2×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Need examples of AI agent workflows for diverse automation and content generation tasks.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Intercom
    2. Zendesk
    3. Google Cloud Natural Language AI
    4. IBM Watson Assistant
    5. Pinecone
    6. Elasticsearch
    7. OpenAI GPT-4
    8. Anthropic Claude 3
    9. Google Gemini Pro
    10. Contentful
    11. Notion
    12. Segment
    13. Salesforce
    14. HubSpot
    15. scikit-learn (scikit-learn/scikit-learn)
    16. DataRobot
    17. Shopify API
    18. Jasper
    19. Copy.ai
    20. Google Ads API
    21. Writesonic
    22. Optimizely
    23. Google Optimize
    24. Mailchimp
    25. Google Ads
    26. Facebook Ads Manager
    27. Feedly
    28. BuzzSumo
    29. Beautiful Soup (crummy/BeautifulSoup)
    30. OpenAI GPT-3.5
    31. Hugging Face Transformers (huggingface/transformers)
    32. Buffer AI Assistant
    33. Hootsuite AI
    34. RiteTag
    35. Hashtagify
    36. Unsplash API
    37. Pexels API
    38. Buffer
    39. Hootsuite
    40. Sprout Social
    41. Google Analytics
    42. VS Code (microsoft/vscode)
    43. GitHub Copilot
    44. Google Gemini Code Assistant
    45. Amazon CodeWhisperer
    46. DeepCode AI
    47. SonarQube
    48. CodiumAI
    49. Pylint (PyCQA/pylint)
    50. ESLint (eslint/eslint)
    51. SonarLint
    52. Git (git/git)
    53. Google Search API
    54. Semantic Scholar API
    55. Scopus API
    56. Apache Tika (apache/tika)
    57. spaCy (explosion/spaCy)
    58. Matplotlib (matplotlib/matplotlib)
    59. Seaborn (mwaskom/seaborn)
    60. Tableau
    61. LaTeX
    62. Microsoft Word API
    63. Google Docs API
    64. World Anvil
    65. Inworld AI
    66. Charisma.ai
    67. AI Dungeon
    68. NovelAI
    69. Sudowrite
    70. Twine (klembot/twinejs)
    71. Unity
    72. Unreal Engine
    73. Unity ML-Agents (Unity-Technologies/ml-agents)
    74. Zoom
    75. Google Meet
    76. Otter.ai
    77. Fathom
    78. Google Cloud Speech-to-Text
    79. AssemblyAI
    80. Deepgram
    81. Whisper (openai/whisper)
    82. Meeting Owl Pro
    83. Fireflies.ai
    84. Grain
    85. Asana API
    86. Jira API
    87. Trello API
    88. SendGrid
    89. Slack

    AI recommended 89 alternatives but never named gyoridavid/ai_agents_az. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I automate social media content creation and research using AI workflows?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Jasper
    2. Copy.ai
    3. ChatGPT
    4. Buffer AI Assistant
    5. Hootsuite AI
    6. Brandwatch
    7. Sprout Social
    8. Synthesia
    9. Descript
    10. Canva Magic Write

    AI recommended 10 alternatives but never named gyoridavid/ai_agents_az. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of gyoridavid/ai_agents_az?
    pass
    AI did not name gyoridavid/ai_agents_az — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts gyoridavid/ai_agents_az in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named gyoridavid/ai_agents_az explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo gyoridavid/ai_agents_az solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name gyoridavid/ai_agents_az — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of gyoridavid/ai_agents_az. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/gyoridavid/ai_agents_az.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/gyoridavid/ai_agents_az)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/gyoridavid/ai_agents_az"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/gyoridavid/ai_agents_az.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

gyoridavid/ai_agents_az — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite