RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

handrew/browserpilot

Default branch main · commit 0c76ea73 · scanned 5/30/2026, 4:58:02 PM

GitHub: 637 stars · 75 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface handrew/browserpilot, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README's opening statement to emphasize its tool aspect

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # 🛫 BrowserPilot

An intelligent web browsing agent controlled by natural language.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # 🛫 BrowserPilot

An AI-powered tool for natural language browser automation, enabling anyone to control web tasks without complex coding. BrowserPilot acts as an intelligent web browsing agent.
  • mediumabout#2
    Add a homepage URL to the repository metadata

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://github.com/handrew/browserpilot
  • lowreadme#3
    Add a 'Why BrowserPilot?' or 'Comparison' section to the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ## ✨ Why BrowserPilot?

BrowserPilot offers a unique approach to web automation by leveraging large language models (like GPT-3/4) to interpret natural language instructions and control a browser directly. Unlike visual builders or purely no-code platforms, BrowserPilot provides a flexible, open-source, Python-based solution for developers and power users who want programmatic control with the ease of natural language prompts. It's ideal for dynamic, complex web tasks where traditional RPA or scraping tools might be brittle.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface handrew/browserpilot
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Axiom.ai
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Axiom.ai · recommended 2×
  2. Zapier · recommended 2×
  3. Make (formerly Integromat) · recommended 2×
  4. Zapier Natural Language Actions (NLA) · recommended 1×
  5. Browserflow · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to automate web tasks using plain English instructions?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Zapier Natural Language Actions (NLA)
    2. Axiom.ai
    3. Browserflow
    4. Robomotion
    5. Tally.so
    6. Zapier
    7. Make (formerly Integromat)
    8. Microsoft Power Automate Desktop

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named handrew/browserpilot. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for an AI-powered tool to automate web interactions without complex coding.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. BrowserFlow
    2. Axiom.ai
    3. Bardeen.ai
    4. Zapier
    5. Make (formerly Integromat)

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named handrew/browserpilot. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of handrew/browserpilot?
    pass
    AI named handrew/browserpilot explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts handrew/browserpilot in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named handrew/browserpilot explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo handrew/browserpilot solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named handrew/browserpilot explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of handrew/browserpilot. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/handrew/browserpilot.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/handrew/browserpilot)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/handrew/browserpilot"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/handrew/browserpilot.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

handrew/browserpilot — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite