RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

harshkedia177/axon

Default branch main · commit 99b6409a · scanned 6/16/2026, 2:27:10 AM

GitHub: 711 stars · 116 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface harshkedia177/axon, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Remove misleading badges linking to 'axoniq'

    Why:

    CURRENT
    [](https://pypi.org/project/axoniq)
[](https://pepy.tech/projects/axoniq)
[](https://pepy.tech/projects/axoniq)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Remove the following lines from your README: `[](https://pypi.org/project/axoniq)`, `[](https://pepy.tech/projects/axoniq)`, and `[](https://pepy.tech/projects/axoniq)`.
  • highlicense#2
    Add a LICENSE file to the repository

    Why:

    CURRENT
    (no LICENSE file detected — the repo has no recognizable license)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a `LICENSE` file in the root of your repository containing the text of your chosen open-source license (e.g., MIT, Apache-2.0, GPL-3.0).
  • mediumhomepage#3
    Add a homepage URL to the repository metadata

    Why:

    CURRENT
    (none)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Go to your repository settings and add a 'Homepage' URL, such as `https://github.com/harshkedia177/axon` or a dedicated project documentation/demo site if one exists.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface harshkedia177/axon
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Sourcegraph
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Sourcegraph · recommended 2×
  2. Code2Graph · recommended 1×
  3. Understand (SciTools) · recommended 1×
  4. Lattix Architect · recommended 1×
  5. Graphviz · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I visualize my codebase structure and dependencies as a knowledge graph?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Code2Graph
    2. Understand (SciTools)
    3. Lattix Architect
    4. Graphviz
    5. Neo4j
    6. Sourcegraph
    7. SonarQube

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named harshkedia177/axon. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What tools help AI agents understand complex codebases for better task execution?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LlamaIndex (run-llama/llama_index)
    2. LangChain (langchain-ai/langchain)
    3. OpenAI API
    4. Tree-sitter (tree-sitter/tree-sitter)
    5. Sourcegraph
    6. GitHub Copilot Enterprise
    7. GitLab Duo Code Suggestions
    8. CodeQL (github/codeql)

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named harshkedia177/axon. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of harshkedia177/axon?
    pass
    AI named harshkedia177/axon explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts harshkedia177/axon in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named harshkedia177/axon explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo harshkedia177/axon solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named harshkedia177/axon explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of harshkedia177/axon. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/harshkedia177/axon.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/harshkedia177/axon)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/harshkedia177/axon"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/harshkedia177/axon.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

harshkedia177/axon — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite