RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

hegelai/prompttools

Default branch main · commit 63bedaa3 · scanned 5/10/2026, 6:22:12 PM

GitHub: 3,039 stars · 256 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
40 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface hegelai/prompttools, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Enhance README opening to highlight systematic evaluation and key differentiators

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Welcome to `prompttools` created by Hegel AI! This repo offers a set of open-source, self-hostable tools for experimenting with, testing, and evaluating LLMs, vector databases, and prompts. The core idea is to enable developers to evaluate using familiar interfaces like _code_, _notebooks_, and a local _playground_.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Welcome to `prompttools` created by Hegel AI! This repo offers a comprehensive, open-source, Python-first framework for systematic prompt engineering, testing, and evaluation of LLMs, vector databases, and prompts. It enables developers to perform A/B testing, track costs, and measure performance metrics using familiar interfaces like code, notebooks, and a local playground.
  • mediumtopics#2
    Add more specific evaluation and testing topics

    Why:

    CURRENT
    deep-learning, developer-tools, embeddings, large-language-models, llms, machine-learning, prompt-engineering, python, vector-search
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    deep-learning, developer-tools, embeddings, large-language-models, llms, machine-learning, prompt-engineering, python, vector-search, llm-evaluation, prompt-testing, ab-testing, rag-evaluation
  • mediumabout#3
    Refine the repository description for clarity on systematic evaluation

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Open-source tools for prompt testing and experimentation, with support for both LLMs (e.g. OpenAI, LLaMA) and vector databases (e.g. Chroma, Weaviate, LanceDB).
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Open-source tools for systematically testing, evaluating, and optimizing LLM prompts and applications, with support for both LLMs (e.g. OpenAI, LLaMA) and vector databases (e.g. Chroma, Weaviate, LanceDB).

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface hegelai/prompttools
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
langchain-ai/langchain
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. langchain-ai/langchain · recommended 1×
  2. confident-ai/deepeval · recommended 1×
  3. explodinggradients/ragas · recommended 1×
  4. run-llama/llama_index · recommended 1×
  5. promptfoo/promptfoo · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are good open-source tools for evaluating LLM prompts and model performance?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain (langchain-ai/langchain)
    2. DeepEval (confident-ai/deepeval)
    3. Ragas (explodinggradients/ragas)
    4. LlamaIndex (run-llama/llama_index)
    5. Promptfoo (promptfoo/promptfoo)
    6. OpenAI Evals (openai/evals)
    7. MLflow (mlflow/mlflow)

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named hegelai/prompttools. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I test retrieval accuracy for vector databases and LLM integrations?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Ragas
    2. LlamaIndex
    3. LangChain
    4. TruLens
    5. DeepEval
    6. Giskard
    7. scikit-learn
    8. nltk

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named hegelai/prompttools. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of hegelai/prompttools?
    pass
    AI named hegelai/prompttools explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts hegelai/prompttools in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named hegelai/prompttools explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo hegelai/prompttools solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named hegelai/prompttools explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of hegelai/prompttools. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/hegelai/prompttools.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/hegelai/prompttools)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/hegelai/prompttools"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/hegelai/prompttools.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

hegelai/prompttools — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite