RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

hinthornw/trustcall

Default branch main · commit 8c7312b5 · scanned 5/27/2026, 2:42:52 AM

GitHub: 1,060 stars · 86 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface hinthornw/trustcall, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README's opening paragraph for clarity

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # 🤝trustcall
    
    LLMs struggle when asked to generate or modify large JSON blobs. `trustcall` solves this by asking the LLM to generate JSON patch operations. This is a simpler task that can be done iteratively. This enables:
    
    - ⚡ Faster & cheaper generation of structured output.
    - 🐺Resilient retrying of validation errors, even for complex, nested schemas (defined as pydantic, schema dictionaries, or regular python functions)
    - 🧩Acccurate updates to existing schemas, avoiding undesired deletions.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # 🤝trustcall
    
    **`trustcall` is a robust Python library for reliable LLM tool calling and structured output generation, built on LangGraph.** It tackles the common challenge of LLMs struggling with complex JSON by enabling them to generate precise JSON patch operations. This iterative approach ensures:
    
    - ⚡ Faster & cheaper generation of structured output.
    - 🐺Resilient retrying of validation errors, even for complex, nested schemas (defined as pydantic, schema dictionaries, or regular python functions)
    - 🧩Acccurate updates to existing schemas, avoiding undesired deletions.
  • mediumhomepage#2
    Add a homepage URL to the repository metadata

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a link to a documentation site, demo, or project page (e.g., `https://hinthornw.github.io/trustcall/` if using GitHub Pages, or a dedicated docs site).

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface hinthornw/trustcall
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
langchain-ai/langchain
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. langchain-ai/langchain · recommended 2×
  2. guardrails-ai/guardrails · recommended 2×
  3. jxnl/instructor · recommended 1×
  4. OpenAI Functions · recommended 1×
  5. Anthropic Tools · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to make LLMs reliably generate or update complex, nested JSON schemas?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Instructor (jxnl/instructor)
    2. OpenAI Functions
    3. Anthropic Tools
    4. LangChain (langchain-ai/langchain)
    5. Guardrails AI (guardrails-ai/guardrails)
    6. Llama 2
    7. gpt-3.5-turbo

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named hinthornw/trustcall. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Seeking a robust way to handle LLM tool call validation errors and schema updates.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Pydantic (pydantic/pydantic)
    2. JSON Schema
    3. Zod (colinhacks/zod)
    4. LangChain's PydanticOutputParser (langchain-ai/langchain)
    5. Instructor (instructor-ai/instructor)
    6. Guardrails AI (guardrails-ai/guardrails)

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named hinthornw/trustcall. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of hinthornw/trustcall?
    pass
    AI named hinthornw/trustcall explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts hinthornw/trustcall in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named hinthornw/trustcall explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo hinthornw/trustcall solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named hinthornw/trustcall explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of hinthornw/trustcall. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/hinthornw/trustcall.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/hinthornw/trustcall)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/hinthornw/trustcall"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/hinthornw/trustcall.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

hinthornw/trustcall — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite