RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

hirofumi0810/neural_sp

Default branch master · commit b91877c6 · scanned 6/15/2026, 2:18:09 AM

GitHub: 594 stars · 134 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
28 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface hirofumi0810/neural_sp, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Add a concise, differentiating introductory statement to README

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # NeuralSP: Neural network based Speech Processing
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # NeuralSP: End-to-end Automatic Speech Recognition and Language Modeling Toolkit
    
    NeuralSP is a PyTorch-based research toolkit focused on advanced end-to-end Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) and Language Modeling (LM). It provides a flexible framework for experimenting with state-of-the-art architectures like Transformers, Conformer, and RNN-Transducers, with strong integration for Kaldi-based feature extraction and data preparation, specifically designed for researchers and developers in speech technology.
  • mediumhomepage#2
    Add a homepage URL to the repository's About section

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    A valid URL pointing to the project's official website, documentation, or a relevant resource.
  • mediumtopics#3
    Add specific topics for Kaldi integration and end-to-end ASR

    Why:

    CURRENT
    asr, attention, attention-mechanism, automatic-speech-recognition, ctc, language-model, language-modeling, pytorch, rnn-transducer, seq2seq, sequence-to-sequence, speech, speech-recognition, streaming, transformer, transformer-xl
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    asr, attention, attention-mechanism, automatic-speech-recognition, ctc, language-model, language-modeling, pytorch, rnn-transducer, seq2seq, sequence-to-sequence, speech, speech-recognition, streaming, transformer, transformer-xl, kaldi-integration, end-to-end-asr

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface hirofumi0810/neural_sp
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Hugging Face Transformers
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Hugging Face Transformers · recommended 1×
  2. PyTorch-Kaldi · recommended 1×
  3. NeMo · recommended 1×
  4. SpeechBrain · recommended 1×
  5. torchaudio · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to build an end-to-end automatic speech recognition system using PyTorch?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Hugging Face Transformers
    2. PyTorch-Kaldi
    3. NeMo
    4. SpeechBrain
    5. torchaudio

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named hirofumi0810/neural_sp. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Seeking a robust PyTorch library for streaming automatic speech recognition with transformer models.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. NVIDIA NeMo (NVIDIA/NeMo)
    2. SpeechBrain (SpeechBrain/SpeechBrain)
    3. ESPnet (espnet/espnet)
    4. transformers (huggingface/transformers)
    5. accelerate (huggingface/accelerate)
    6. torchaudio (pytorch/audio)
    7. OpenAI Whisper (openai/whisper)

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named hirofumi0810/neural_sp. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of hirofumi0810/neural_sp?
    pass
    AI did not name hirofumi0810/neural_sp — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts hirofumi0810/neural_sp in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named hirofumi0810/neural_sp explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo hirofumi0810/neural_sp solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named hirofumi0810/neural_sp explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of hirofumi0810/neural_sp. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/hirofumi0810/neural_sp.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/hirofumi0810/neural_sp)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/hirofumi0810/neural_sp"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/hirofumi0810/neural_sp.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

hirofumi0810/neural_sp — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite