RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

hooosberg/WitNote

Default branch main · commit 8bdf37ff · scanned 6/16/2026, 12:31:52 AM

GitHub: 549 stars · 33 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface hooosberg/WitNote, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highlicense#1
    Add a LICENSE file to the repository

    Why:

    CURRENT
    (no LICENSE file detected — the repo has no recognizable license)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a LICENSE file in the repository root, choosing a standard open-source license such as MIT, Apache-2.0, or GPL-3.0.
  • highreadme#2
    Reposition the core description at the top of the README

    Why:

    CURRENT
    The current README starts with a centered H1 and slogan, with the core description appearing further down.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Move the sentence "WitNote is a local-first AI writing companion for macOS and Windows." to the very top of the README, immediately below the main H1 title.
  • mediumreadme#3
    Add explicit feature highlights to the README introduction

    Why:

    CURRENT
    The current README excerpt does not prominently feature a concise list of key capabilities at the very top.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a short, concise paragraph or bulleted list near the top of the README, explicitly highlighting "Local-first AI writing," "macOS & Windows support," "Multilingual markdown editing," and "Ollama/WebLLM integration for local AI models."

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface hooosberg/WitNote
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
TypingMind
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. TypingMind · recommended 1×
  2. LM Studio · recommended 1×
  3. Ollama · recommended 1×
  4. LocalAI · recommended 1×
  5. Jan · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    I need a desktop AI writing assistant that runs locally on macOS and Windows.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. TypingMind
    2. LM Studio
    3. Ollama
    4. LocalAI
    5. Jan
    6. GPT4All

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named hooosberg/WitNote. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are good local-first note-taking apps with AI assistance and multilingual markdown support?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Obsidian
    2. Logseq
    3. Joplin
    4. Anytype
    5. Notion

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named hooosberg/WitNote. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of hooosberg/WitNote?
    pass
    AI named hooosberg/WitNote explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts hooosberg/WitNote in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named hooosberg/WitNote explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo hooosberg/WitNote solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named hooosberg/WitNote explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of hooosberg/WitNote. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/hooosberg/WitNote.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/hooosberg/WitNote)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/hooosberg/WitNote"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/hooosberg/WitNote.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

hooosberg/WitNote — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite