RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

hotovo/aider-desk

Default branch main · commit 8e0992d6 · scanned 6/30/2026, 4:22:10 AM

GitHub: 1,300 stars · 110 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
40 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface hotovo/aider-desk, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Clarify the README's opening sentence to emphasize AI coding agent orchestration

    Why:

    CURRENT
    AiderDesk is an open-source agentic platform that puts **you** back in the driver's seat of AI-assisted development.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    AiderDesk is an open-source agentic platform for orchestrating and steering AI coding agents, putting **you** back in the driver's seat of AI-assisted development.
  • mediumtopics#2
    Add more specific topics to differentiate from general AI frameworks and IDEs

    Why:

    CURRENT
    ai, ai-coding, ai-coding-tools, ai-developer-tools, ai-development, coding, electron-app
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ai, ai-coding, ai-coding-tools, ai-developer-tools, ai-development, coding, electron-app, ai-agents, agentic-ai, llm-orchestration, developer-platform, ai-code-generation, ai-code-review
  • lowcomparison#3
    Add a 'Comparison' or 'How AiderDesk Differs' section to the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a new section, e.g., 'How AiderDesk Differs' or 'Comparison to Other Tools', that explicitly clarifies AiderDesk's position. For example, state that it is an orchestration *platform* for *coding agents*, not a general AI framework (like LangChain) or an AI-enhanced IDE (like GitHub Copilot). Emphasize its focus on transparent control and review for professional software engineers.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface hotovo/aider-desk
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
LangChain
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. LangChain · recommended 1×
  2. LlamaIndex · recommended 1×
  3. Microsoft Semantic Kernel · recommended 1×
  4. AutoGPT · recommended 1×
  5. Haystack · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are robust platforms for professional developers to orchestrate and steer AI coding agents?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain
    2. LlamaIndex
    3. Microsoft Semantic Kernel
    4. AutoGPT
    5. Haystack
    6. OpenAI Assistants API
    7. CrewAI

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named hotovo/aider-desk. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Seeking an AI-powered coding environment providing transparent control and change review for development.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. GitHub Copilot
    2. VS Code (microsoft/vscode)
    3. Cursor
    4. JetBrains IDEs
    5. Code With Me
    6. AI Assistant
    7. Google Colaboratory (Colab)
    8. Gemini
    9. Codey
    10. Replit
    11. Ghostwriter

    AI recommended 11 alternatives but never named hotovo/aider-desk. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of hotovo/aider-desk?
    pass
    AI named hotovo/aider-desk explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts hotovo/aider-desk in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named hotovo/aider-desk explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo hotovo/aider-desk solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named hotovo/aider-desk explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of hotovo/aider-desk. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/hotovo/aider-desk.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/hotovo/aider-desk)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/hotovo/aider-desk"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/hotovo/aider-desk.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

hotovo/aider-desk — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite