RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

huangwb8/ChineseResearchLaTeX

Default branch main · commit cfeff0bb · scanned 5/11/2026, 10:57:26 PM

GitHub: 1,558 stars · 172 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
28 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface huangwb8/ChineseResearchLaTeX, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Clarify the primary offering in the README's opening

    Why:

    CURRENT
    The current README places the "AI Agent" pitch immediately after the H1.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Insert a concise sentence after the H1 that clearly states the repo's primary purpose as a template collection, before introducing the AI integration. For example: '本项目提供一套为中国科研人员量身定制的LaTeX模板，涵盖国自然标书、SCI论文、毕业论文及学术简历，并创新性地融入AI辅助写作流程。'
  • hightopics#2
    Refine topics to emphasize core offering and audience

    Why:

    CURRENT
    ai, claude-code, codex-cli, funding, graduate, latex-template, research, researchpapers, vibe-codng
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    latex-template, chinese-research, academic-writing, research, researchpapers, funding, graduate, ai-assisted-writing
  • mediumhomepage#3
    Add a relevant homepage URL

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a relevant project website or author's academic page URL to the repository's homepage field.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface huangwb8/ChineseResearchLaTeX
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Overleaf
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Overleaf · recommended 1×
  2. CTAN · recommended 1×
  3. GitHub · recommended 1×
  4. GitLab · recommended 1×
  5. Peking University · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Where can I find LaTeX templates for Chinese research papers, theses, and grant applications?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Overleaf
    2. CTAN
    3. GitHub
    4. GitLab
    5. Peking University
    6. Tsinghua University
    7. IEEE
    8. Springer
    9. Elsevier
    10. Zhihu
    11. CSDN

    AI recommended 11 alternatives but never named huangwb8/ChineseResearchLaTeX. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What AI-powered tools assist with drafting scientific research papers and funding proposals?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. ChatGPT
    2. Elicit
    3. Semantic Scholar
    4. QuillBot
    5. Grammarly
    6. Scite.ai
    7. Consensus

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named huangwb8/ChineseResearchLaTeX. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of huangwb8/ChineseResearchLaTeX?
    pass
    AI named huangwb8/ChineseResearchLaTeX explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts huangwb8/ChineseResearchLaTeX in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named huangwb8/ChineseResearchLaTeX explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo huangwb8/ChineseResearchLaTeX solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name huangwb8/ChineseResearchLaTeX — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of huangwb8/ChineseResearchLaTeX. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/huangwb8/ChineseResearchLaTeX.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/huangwb8/ChineseResearchLaTeX)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/huangwb8/ChineseResearchLaTeX"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/huangwb8/ChineseResearchLaTeX.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

huangwb8/ChineseResearchLaTeX — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite