RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

huridocs/pdf-document-layout-analysis

Default branch main · commit f361d1e4 · scanned 5/10/2026, 4:57:08 PM

GitHub: 1,114 stars · 128 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
22 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
1 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface huridocs/pdf-document-layout-analysis, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Strengthen the README's opening paragraph with key differentiators

    Why:

    CURRENT
    The current README structure places the detailed 'Overview' section after 'Feedback & Use Cases', delaying the presentation of core features.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Insert the following paragraph directly after the initial subtitle and project links, before the '## Feedback & Use Cases' section:

This powerful, Docker-powered microservice offers intelligent PDF document layout analysis, OCR, and content extraction. It accurately segments and classifies elements like texts, titles, pictures, tables, and formulas, determines reading order, and converts PDFs to Markdown or HTML with Ollama-powered automatic translation. It provides both a user-friendly Gradio web interface and a comprehensive REST API.
  • mediumhomepage#2
    Add a homepage URL to the repository's About section

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://huridocs.org

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface huridocs/pdf-document-layout-analysis
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Google Cloud Document AI
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Google Cloud Document AI · recommended 2×
  2. Amazon Textract · recommended 2×
  3. Adobe Acrobat Pro DC · recommended 1×
  4. PDFTron SDK (Apryse) · recommended 1×
  5. Layout-Parser/layout-parser · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for a service to segment and classify elements in PDF pages.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Adobe Acrobat Pro DC
    2. PDFTron SDK (Apryse)
    3. LayoutParser (Layout-Parser/layout-parser)
    4. Google Cloud Document AI
    5. Amazon Textract
    6. Microsoft Azure Form Recognizer (now Azure AI Document Intelligence)

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named huridocs/pdf-document-layout-analysis. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Need a Dockerized service for intelligent PDF content extraction and segmentation.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Apache Tika
    2. PDFMiner.six
    3. Grobid
    4. LayoutParser
    5. Amazon Textract
    6. Google Cloud Document AI

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named huridocs/pdf-document-layout-analysis. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of huridocs/pdf-document-layout-analysis?
    pass
    AI did not name huridocs/pdf-document-layout-analysis — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts huridocs/pdf-document-layout-analysis in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named huridocs/pdf-document-layout-analysis explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo huridocs/pdf-document-layout-analysis solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name huridocs/pdf-document-layout-analysis — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of huridocs/pdf-document-layout-analysis. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/huridocs/pdf-document-layout-analysis.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/huridocs/pdf-document-layout-analysis)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/huridocs/pdf-document-layout-analysis"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/huridocs/pdf-document-layout-analysis.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

huridocs/pdf-document-layout-analysis — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite