RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

hysts/pytorch_image_classification

Default branch master · commit 993089a3 · scanned 6/20/2026, 11:02:54 PM

GitHub: 1,444 stars · 307 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface hysts/pytorch_image_classification, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README opening to clarify project scope and differentiator

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # PyTorch Image Classification
    
    Following papers are implemented using PyTorch.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # PyTorch Image Classification
    
    This repository provides a comprehensive and modular PyTorch framework for implementing, training, and benchmarking a wide range of image classification models. It includes state-of-the-art architectures from numerous research papers, designed for datasets like CIFAR-10/100, MNIST, FashionMNIST, Kuzushiji-MNIST, and ImageNet.
  • highhomepage#2
    Add the repository URL as the homepage

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://github.com/hysts/pytorch_image_classification
  • mediumtopics#3
    Expand repository topics with more specific keywords

    Why:

    CURRENT
    cifar10, computer-vision, fashion-mnist, imagenet, pytorch
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    cifar10, computer-vision, fashion-mnist, imagenet, pytorch, deep-learning-models, model-zoo, image-recognition, research-framework, benchmarking

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface hysts/pytorch_image_classification
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
pytorch/vision
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. pytorch/vision · recommended 1×
  2. rwightman/pytorch-image-models · recommended 1×
  3. qubvel/segmentation_models.pytorch · recommended 1×
  4. PavelPleskov/pytorchcv · recommended 1×
  5. PyTorch Lightning · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are good PyTorch implementations for common image classification models like ResNet or DenseNet?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. torchvision.models (pytorch/vision)
    2. timm (rwightman/pytorch-image-models)
    3. segmentation_models.pytorch (qubvel/segmentation_models.pytorch)
    4. pytorchcv (PavelPleskov/pytorchcv)

    AI recommended 4 alternatives but never named hysts/pytorch_image_classification. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I efficiently train deep learning models for image classification on CIFAR-10 datasets?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. PyTorch Lightning
    2. Keras
    3. Fastai
    4. TensorFlow
    5. Hugging Face Accelerate
    6. Catalyst
    7. Optuna

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named hysts/pytorch_image_classification. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of hysts/pytorch_image_classification?
    pass
    AI named hysts/pytorch_image_classification explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts hysts/pytorch_image_classification in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named hysts/pytorch_image_classification explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo hysts/pytorch_image_classification solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named hysts/pytorch_image_classification explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of hysts/pytorch_image_classification. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/hysts/pytorch_image_classification.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/hysts/pytorch_image_classification)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/hysts/pytorch_image_classification"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/hysts/pytorch_image_classification.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

hysts/pytorch_image_classification — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite