RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

icefort-ai/awesome-llm-webapps

Default branch main · commit 10a4c587 · scanned 6/2/2026, 5:57:45 AM

GitHub: 714 stars · 36 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
22 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
1 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface icefort-ai/awesome-llm-webapps, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • hightopics#1
    Add relevant topics to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    llm, web-applications, awesome-list, chatbot, ai-assistants, rag, open-source, generative-ai
  • highreadme#2
    Refine README H1 to explicitly state 'Awesome List'

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # Open Source, Actively Maintained Web Apps for LLMs 💬
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # Awesome List: Open Source, Actively Maintained Web Apps for LLMs 💬
  • mediumhomepage#3
    Add a homepage URL to the repository metadata

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://github.com/icefort-ai/awesome-llm-webapps

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface icefort-ai/awesome-llm-webapps
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
langchain-ai/langchain
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. langchain-ai/langchain · recommended 1×
  2. gradio-app/gradio · recommended 1×
  3. run-llama/llama_index · recommended 1×
  4. mckaywrigley/chatbot-ui · recommended 1×
  5. LAION-AI/Open-Assistant · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Where can I find open-source, actively maintained web applications to jumpstart my LLM project?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain (langchain-ai/langchain)
    2. Gradio (gradio-app/gradio)
    3. LlamaIndex (run-llama/llama_index)
    4. Chatbot UI (mckaywrigley/chatbot-ui)
    5. Open-Assistant (LAION-AI/Open-Assistant)
    6. PrivateGPT (imartinez/privateGPT)

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named icefort-ai/awesome-llm-webapps. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are some high-quality, functioning web applications for building LLM chatbots or assistants?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain Templates / LangServe
    2. Gradio
    3. Streamlit
    4. Voiceflow
    5. Botpress
    6. Flask
    7. Django
    8. Node.js
    9. React
    10. Vue
    11. Angular
    12. Bubble.io

    AI recommended 12 alternatives but never named icefort-ai/awesome-llm-webapps. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of icefort-ai/awesome-llm-webapps?
    pass
    AI did not name icefort-ai/awesome-llm-webapps — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts icefort-ai/awesome-llm-webapps in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named icefort-ai/awesome-llm-webapps explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo icefort-ai/awesome-llm-webapps solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name icefort-ai/awesome-llm-webapps — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of icefort-ai/awesome-llm-webapps. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/icefort-ai/awesome-llm-webapps.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/icefort-ai/awesome-llm-webapps)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/icefort-ai/awesome-llm-webapps"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/icefort-ai/awesome-llm-webapps.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

icefort-ai/awesome-llm-webapps — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite