RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

ifixai-ai/iFixAi

Default branch main · commit 64d36578 · scanned 6/18/2026, 3:46:57 PM

GitHub: 522 stars · 98 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
40 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface ifixai-ai/iFixAi, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README's opening tagline to clarify AI system focus

    Why:

    CURRENT
    <p align="center"><strong>The diagnostic about AI Operational Misalignment</strong></p>
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    <p align="center"><strong>iFixAi: The AI System Diagnostic for Operational Misalignment & Risk Compliance</strong></p>
  • mediumreadme#2
    Add a clear statement about AI risk and compliance to README intro

    Why:

    CURRENT
    iFixAi detects AI operational misalignment before it damages your business.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    iFixAi detects AI operational misalignment before it damages your business. It's a comprehensive diagnostic tool for AI systems, designed to mitigate frontier risks like prompt injection and hallucination, and ensure regulatory compliance before deployment.
  • lowcomparison#3
    Add a 'Comparison to Alternatives' section in README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ## Comparison to Alternatives

While tools like Giskard and Arthur AI offer valuable LLM evaluation, iFixAi provides a comprehensive, industry-agnostic diagnostic suite with 45 inspections, specifically targeting operational misalignment and frontier risks like sabotage and oversight evasion, returning a graded assessment in under 5 minutes.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface ifixai-ai/iFixAi
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Giskard
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Giskard · recommended 1×
  2. Microsoft Azure AI Content Safety · recommended 1×
  3. OpenAI Evals · recommended 1×
  4. LangChain · recommended 1×
  5. Confidential AI · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to assess and mitigate AI risks, like prompt injection and hallucination, before deployment?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Giskard
    2. Microsoft Azure AI Content Safety
    3. OpenAI Evals
    4. LangChain
    5. Confidential AI
    6. NeMo Guardrails
    7. Scale AI
    8. Appen

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named ifixai-ai/iFixAi. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Seeking a diagnostic tool for evaluating LLM operational alignment and regulatory compliance.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Arthur AI

    AI recommended 1 alternative but never named ifixai-ai/iFixAi. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of ifixai-ai/iFixAi?
    pass
    AI named ifixai-ai/iFixAi explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts ifixai-ai/iFixAi in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named ifixai-ai/iFixAi explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo ifixai-ai/iFixAi solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named ifixai-ai/iFixAi explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of ifixai-ai/iFixAi. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/ifixai-ai/iFixAi.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/ifixai-ai/iFixAi)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/ifixai-ai/iFixAi"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/ifixai-ai/iFixAi.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

ifixai-ai/iFixAi — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite