RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

iwyxdxl/WeChatBot_WXAUTO_SE

Default branch main · commit 972bfae4 · scanned 6/3/2026, 4:27:04 PM

GitHub: 873 stars · 149 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
22 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
1 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface iwyxdxl/WeChatBot_WXAUTO_SE, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • hightopics#1
    Add specific topics to improve categorization

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    llm-bot, wechat-bot, wechat-automation, ai-chatbot, local-llm, llm-api-aggregation
  • highreadme#2
    Reposition README's opening to clarify WeChat focus

    Why:

    CURRENT
    - 本项目是一个 LLM API 聚合与自动化调用工具。
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    - 本项目是一个基于LLM API的微信自动化对话与消息处理工具。
  • mediumreadme#3
    Clarify the project's license prominently in the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a dedicated 'License' section or a clear statement near the top of the README, such as: '本项目遵循 GNU GPL-3.0 或更高版本许可证。'

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface iwyxdxl/WeChatBot_WXAUTO_SE
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Ollama
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Ollama · recommended 1×
  2. LM Studio · recommended 1×
  3. LocalAI · recommended 1×
  4. Jan · recommended 1×
  5. llama.cpp · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Seeking tools to integrate large language models for automating chat responses locally.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Ollama
    2. LM Studio
    3. LocalAI
    4. Jan
    5. llama.cpp
    6. Transformers

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named iwyxdxl/WeChatBot_WXAUTO_SE. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are self-hosted AI chatbot solutions offering memory, timed tasks, and web search?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Botpress
    2. Rasa
    3. Open Assistant
    4. Llama 2
    5. Mistral
    6. Falcon
    7. ollama
    8. text-generation-webui
    9. vLLM
    10. LangChain
    11. LlamaIndex
    12. Haystack
    13. Tiledesk
    14. OpenAI API
    15. Anthropic API
    16. PostgreSQL
    17. MongoDB
    18. Redis
    19. APScheduler
    20. node-schedule
    21. Celery
    22. RabbitMQ

    AI recommended 22 alternatives but never named iwyxdxl/WeChatBot_WXAUTO_SE. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of iwyxdxl/WeChatBot_WXAUTO_SE?
    pass
    AI did not name iwyxdxl/WeChatBot_WXAUTO_SE — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts iwyxdxl/WeChatBot_WXAUTO_SE in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named iwyxdxl/WeChatBot_WXAUTO_SE explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo iwyxdxl/WeChatBot_WXAUTO_SE solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name iwyxdxl/WeChatBot_WXAUTO_SE — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of iwyxdxl/WeChatBot_WXAUTO_SE. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/iwyxdxl/WeChatBot_WXAUTO_SE.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/iwyxdxl/WeChatBot_WXAUTO_SE)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/iwyxdxl/WeChatBot_WXAUTO_SE"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/iwyxdxl/WeChatBot_WXAUTO_SE.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

iwyxdxl/WeChatBot_WXAUTO_SE — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite