RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

jart/emacs-copilot

Default branch main · commit c629d395 · scanned 6/1/2026, 5:07:52 PM

GitHub: 752 stars · 22 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface jart/emacs-copilot, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • hightopics#1
    Add relevant topics to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    emacs, llm, code-completion, ai-assistant, local-llm, pair-programming, emacs-lisp
  • highreadme#2
    Reposition the README's opening sentence to emphasize local LLM and Emacs

    Why:

    CURRENT
    The `copilot-complete` function demonstrates that ~100 lines of LISP is all it takes for Emacs to do that thing Github Copilot and VSCode are famous for doing except superior w.r.t. both quality and freedom
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Emacs Copilot provides AI-powered code completion and pair programming assistance directly within Emacs, leveraging local large language models (LLMs) for superior quality and freedom.
  • mediumhomepage#3
    Add the repository URL as the homepage

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://github.com/jart/emacs-copilot

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface jart/emacs-copilot
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
eglot
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. eglot · recommended 1×
  2. ollama · recommended 1×
  3. Continue · recommended 1×
  4. llama.cpp · recommended 1×
  5. lsp-mode · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I integrate a local large language model for code completion in Emacs?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. eglot
    2. ollama
    3. Continue
    4. llama.cpp
    5. lsp-mode
    6. copilot.el
    7. llm.el
    8. tabnine

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named jart/emacs-copilot. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for an AI pair programmer assistant that runs locally within my Emacs editor.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. TabNine
    2. CodeGPT (joshuacode/company-codegpt)
    3. Ollama (ollama/ollama)
    4. GitHub Copilot
    5. llm.el (emacs-openai/llm.el)

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named jart/emacs-copilot. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of jart/emacs-copilot?
    pass
    AI named jart/emacs-copilot explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts jart/emacs-copilot in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named jart/emacs-copilot explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo jart/emacs-copilot solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named jart/emacs-copilot explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of jart/emacs-copilot. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/jart/emacs-copilot.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/jart/emacs-copilot)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/jart/emacs-copilot"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/jart/emacs-copilot.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

jart/emacs-copilot — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite