RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

jaw9c/awesome-remote-mcp-servers

Default branch main · commit e16d68b3 · scanned 6/18/2026, 6:27:47 PM

GitHub: 1,077 stars · 379 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
22 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
1 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface jaw9c/awesome-remote-mcp-servers, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface jaw9c/awesome-remote-mcp-servers
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
AWS API Gateway
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. AWS API Gateway · recommended 1×
  2. Azure API Management · recommended 1×
  3. Google Cloud API Gateway · recommended 1×
  4. Kong Gateway · recommended 1×
  5. Apigee · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to connect AI models to external tools over the internet securely?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. AWS API Gateway
    2. Azure API Management
    3. Google Cloud API Gateway
    4. Kong Gateway
    5. Apigee
    6. Istio
    7. Linkerd
    8. Consul Connect
    9. AWS WAF
    10. Azure Front Door
    11. Google Cloud Armor
    12. AWS PrivateLink
    13. Azure Private Link
    14. Google Cloud Private Service Connect
    15. Auth0
    16. Okta
    17. AWS Cognito
    18. Azure Active Directory B2C
    19. Let's Encrypt
    20. DigiCert
    21. GlobalSign
    22. AWS Secrets Manager
    23. Azure Key Vault
    24. Google Secret Manager
    25. HashiCorp Vault

    AI recommended 25 alternatives but never named jaw9c/awesome-remote-mcp-servers. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Where can I find reliable production-ready services for AI model integrations?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Vertex AI
    2. Amazon SageMaker
    3. Azure Machine Learning
    4. Hugging Face Transformers (huggingface/transformers)
    5. Hugging Face Inference API
    6. OpenAI API
    7. MLflow (mlflow/mlflow)

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named jaw9c/awesome-remote-mcp-servers. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of jaw9c/awesome-remote-mcp-servers?
    pass
    AI named jaw9c/awesome-remote-mcp-servers explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts jaw9c/awesome-remote-mcp-servers in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI did not name jaw9c/awesome-remote-mcp-servers — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo jaw9c/awesome-remote-mcp-servers solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name jaw9c/awesome-remote-mcp-servers — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of jaw9c/awesome-remote-mcp-servers. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/jaw9c/awesome-remote-mcp-servers.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/jaw9c/awesome-remote-mcp-servers)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/jaw9c/awesome-remote-mcp-servers"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/jaw9c/awesome-remote-mcp-servers.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

jaw9c/awesome-remote-mcp-servers — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite