RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

jhj0517/Whisper-WebUI

Default branch master · commit c3bb3b18 · scanned 6/22/2026, 9:46:59 AM

GitHub: 2,817 stars · 425 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
28 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface jhj0517/Whisper-WebUI, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README H1 to specify its open-source, self-hostable nature

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # Whisper-WebUI
    A Gradio-based browser interface for Whisper. You can use it as an Easy Subtitle Generator!
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # Whisper-WebUI: An Open-Source, Self-Hostable Web UI for Whisper
    A Gradio-based browser interface for Whisper, designed for easy subtitle generation and advanced audio processing. This open-source project allows you to run a powerful, local solution for transcription, translation, and diarization, offering a robust alternative to commercial SaaS platforms.
  • hightopics#2
    Add more specific topics to improve category visibility

    Why:

    CURRENT
    ai, gradio, open-source, python, pytorch, web-ui, whisper
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ai, gradio, open-source, python, pytorch, web-ui, whisper, speech-to-text, audio-transcription, subtitle-generator, diarization, translation, self-hosted
  • mediumreadme#3
    Add a 'Why Choose Whisper-WebUI?' section to highlight differentiators

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ## Why Choose Whisper-WebUI?
    Unlike commercial SaaS solutions, Whisper-WebUI is an open-source, self-hostable application, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure. Compared to command-line tools or libraries like pyannote.audio, it provides a user-friendly web interface that integrates advanced features such as speaker diarization, multiple Whisper backends (faster-whisper, insanely-fast-whisper), and text-to-text translation via NLLB or DeepL, all in one accessible package.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface jhj0517/Whisper-WebUI
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Happy Scribe
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Happy Scribe · recommended 1×
  2. VEED.IO · recommended 1×
  3. Kapwing · recommended 1×
  4. Rev.com · recommended 1×
  5. Trint · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I easily generate subtitles from video files or YouTube using a web interface?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Happy Scribe
    2. VEED.IO
    3. Kapwing
    4. Rev.com
    5. Trint
    6. Amara

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named jhj0517/Whisper-WebUI. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What open-source tools provide a web interface for speech-to-text translation and speaker diarization?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. WhisperX
    2. Vosk
    3. pyannote.audio
    4. Mozilla DeepSpeech
    5. Kaldi

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named jhj0517/Whisper-WebUI. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of jhj0517/Whisper-WebUI?
    pass
    AI did not name jhj0517/Whisper-WebUI — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts jhj0517/Whisper-WebUI in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named jhj0517/Whisper-WebUI explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo jhj0517/Whisper-WebUI solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named jhj0517/Whisper-WebUI explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of jhj0517/Whisper-WebUI. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/jhj0517/Whisper-WebUI.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/jhj0517/Whisper-WebUI)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/jhj0517/Whisper-WebUI"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/jhj0517/Whisper-WebUI.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

jhj0517/Whisper-WebUI — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite