REPOGEO REPORT · LITE
jingyi0000/VLM_survey
Default branch main · commit e7f12322 · scanned 5/15/2026, 6:53:09 PM
GitHub: 3,117 stars · 233 forks
Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface jingyi0000/VLM_survey, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.
Action plan — copy-paste fixes
3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.
- highabout#1Update the 'About' description to clarify repo's identity as a survey paper's official repository
Why:
CURRENTCollection of AWESOME vision-language models for vision tasks
COPY-PASTE FIXOfficial repository for 'Vision-Language Models for Vision Tasks: A Survey' (TPAMI 2024), offering a systematic collection of VLM studies for visual recognition tasks.
- highlicense#2Add a LICENSE file to the repository
Why:
COPY-PASTE FIXCreate a LICENSE file (e.g., MIT License) in the repository root to clarify usage rights.
- mediumhomepage#3Add the survey paper's link as the repository homepage
Why:
COPY-PASTE FIXhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2304.00685
Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash
Category visibility — the real GEO test
Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?
Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.
- Papers with Code · recommended 1×
- Hugging Face Transformers Library · recommended 1×
- CLIP · recommended 1×
- ViLT · recommended 1×
- BLIP · recommended 1×
- CATEGORY QUERYWhere can I find a comprehensive overview of vision-language models for computer vision tasks?you: not recommendedAI recommended (in order):
- Papers with Code
- Hugging Face Transformers Library
AI recommended 2 alternatives but never named jingyi0000/VLM_survey. This is the gap to close.
Show full AI answer
- CATEGORY QUERYWhat are the leading multi-modal deep learning models for various visual recognition problems?you: not recommendedAI recommended (in order):
- CLIP
- ViLT
- BLIP
- Flamingo
- CoCa
- ALBEF
- OpenCLIP
AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named jingyi0000/VLM_survey. This is the gap to close.
Show full AI answer
Objective checks
Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.
- Metadata completenesswarn
Suggestion:
- README presencepass
Self-mention check
Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?
- Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of jingyi0000/VLM_survey?passAI named jingyi0000/VLM_survey explicitly
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?
- If a team adopts jingyi0000/VLM_survey in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?passAI named jingyi0000/VLM_survey explicitly
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?
- In one sentence, what problem does the repo jingyi0000/VLM_survey solve, and who is the primary audience?passAI did not name jingyi0000/VLM_survey — likely talking about a different project
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?
Embed your GEO score
Drop this badge into the README of jingyi0000/VLM_survey. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.
[](https://repogeo.com/en/r/jingyi0000/VLM_survey)<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/jingyi0000/VLM_survey"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/jingyi0000/VLM_survey.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses
jingyi0000/VLM_survey — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.
- Deep reports10 / month
- Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
- Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite